英文:
Can we call va_start() twice without calling va_end() in between?
问题
这段代码在同一可变参数列表上两次调用了 va_start()
函数,并且没有在这两次调用之间调用 va_end()
函数。这样的做法会导致未定义行为。
英文:
Here is my minimal example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <string.h>
void print_strings_and_lengths(int count, ...)
{
va_list ap;
/* Print strings */
va_start(ap, count);
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
char *s = va_arg(ap, char *);
printf("%d - %s\n", i, s);
}
/* Print string lengths */
va_start(ap, count); /* Is it okay to call va_start() again without calling va_end()? */
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
char *s = va_arg(ap, char *);
printf("%d - %zu\n", i, strlen(s));
}
va_end(ap);
}
int main()
{
print_strings_and_lengths(3, "apple", "ball", "cat");
return 0;
}
This code is calling va_start()
twice on the same list of variable arguments. The va_end()
function is not called between the two calls. Is this code well defined or does it invoke undefined behavior?
答案1
得分: 2
C11 7.16.1/1:
> [...] va_start
和 va_copy
宏的每次调用都应在同一函数中有相应的 va_end
宏的匹配调用。
这两个 va_start
调用都没有相应的 va_end
,因此代码会导致未定义的行为,不需要诊断,因为上述引用不是一个约束的一部分。
英文:
C11 7.16.1/1:
>[...] Each invocation of the va_start
and va_copy
macros shall be matched by a corresponding invocation of the va_end
macro in the same function.
There's no corresponding va_end
for both of the va_start
calls so the code causes undefined behaviour, with no diagnostic required as the above quote is not part of a Constraint.
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库,让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论