使用R中的across()函数创建多个新列

huangapple go评论106阅读模式
英文:

Creating multiple NEW columns using across() in R

问题

我理解你的问题是,你想使用mutate创建不依赖于现有列的新列。

你可以使用以下方法创建新列,而不引用现有列:

tibble(
    a = 1:5,
    b = LETTERS[1:5]
) %>%
    mutate(new_column = NA)

这将创建一个名为new_column的新列,并将其填充为NA

希望这可以帮助到你!如果你有任何其他问题,请随时问。

英文:

The difference between my question and existing questions is that I want to create new columns with mutate that do not depend on existing columns.

Some dummy data:

library(dplyr)
dat <- tibble(
    a = 1:5,
    b = LETTERS[1:5]
)

I know I can create new columns one-by-one like so

dat <- dat %>%
    mutate(foo = NA, bar = NA, bar2 = NA)

And I can modify columns more conveniently using across, e.g. :

new_vars <- c("foo", "bar", "bar2")
dat <- dat %>%
    mutate(across(all_of(new_vars), ~ replace(., is.na(.), 0)))

But how do I create new columns without referencing existing columns in a similar manner? E.g. adding new columns filled with NA:

tibble(
    a = 1:5,
    b = LETTERS[1:5]
) %>% 
    # mutate(across(all_of(new_vars), ~ function(.x) NA))  # Error
    mutate(across(all_of(new_vars), NA))                   # Error

Open to any tidyverse alternatives.

答案1

得分: 4

类似于这个答案中提到的方法,你可以使用以下代码:

new_vars <- c("foo", "bar", "bar2")

tibble(
  a = 1:5,
  b = LETTERS[1:5]
) %>% 
  mutate(!!!setNames(rep(NA, length(new_vars)), new_vars))
# 或者(感谢 @joran)
# tibble::add_column(!!!setNames(rep(NA, length(new_vars)), new_vars))

输出结果为:

     a b     foo   bar   bar2 
  <int> <chr> <lgl> <lgl> <lgl>
1     1 A     NA    NA    NA   
2     2 B     NA    NA    NA   
3     3 C     NA    NA    NA   
4     4 D     NA    NA    NA   
5     5 E     NA    NA    NA   

请注意,这是一段R代码,用于在数据框中添加指定名称的空列。

英文:

Similar to this answer buried in the popular question here, you can use:

new_vars &lt;- c(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;bar&quot;, &quot;bar2&quot;)

tibble(
  a = 1:5,
  b = LETTERS[1:5]
) %&gt;% 
  mutate(!!!setNames(rep(NA, length(new_vars)), new_vars))
# or (thanks @joran)
# tibble::add_column(!!!setNames(rep(NA, length(new_vars)), new_vars))

output

     a b     foo   bar   bar2 
  &lt;int&gt; &lt;chr&gt; &lt;lgl&gt; &lt;lgl&gt; &lt;lgl&gt;
1     1 A     NA    NA    NA   
2     2 B     NA    NA    NA   
3     3 C     NA    NA    NA   
4     4 D     NA    NA    NA   
5     5 E     NA    NA    NA   

答案2

得分: 4

我尽量避免使用过多的tidyverse工具,但是为了避免简单的方法,我们正在做一些有点荒谬的事情,我个人认为。

这里是一个友好的管道示例:

library(dplyr)
dat <- tibble(
  a = 1:5,
  b = LETTERS[1:5]
)

new_vars <- c("foo", "bar", "bar2")

# ?
# dat[new_vars] <- NA

add_vars <- function(df, vars, val) {
  df[vars] <- val
  df
}

dat %>%
  add_vars(df = ., vars = new_vars, val = NA)

你甚至可以使用匿名函数(但只能与magrittr管道一起使用):

dat %>%
  (\(x) {x[new_vars] <- NA; x})

这也适用于function(x)语法(与magrittr管道一起使用)。

英文:

I use tidyverse stuff as much as the next fellow, but the lengths we're going to to avoid doing things the simple way is getting a little silly, imho.

Here. Pipe friendly.

library(dplyr)
dat &lt;- tibble(
  a = 1:5,
  b = LETTERS[1:5]
)

new_vars &lt;- c(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;bar&quot;, &quot;bar2&quot;)

# ?
# dat[new_vars] &lt;- NA

add_vars &lt;- function(df,vars,val){
  df[vars] &lt;- val
  df
}

dat |&gt;
  add_vars(df = _,vars = new_vars,val = NA)

You could even use an anonymous function (but only with the magrittr pipe):

dat %&gt;%
  (\(x) {x[new_vars] &lt;- NA; x})

This also works (with the magrittr pipe) with the function(x) syntax.

答案3

得分: 3

使用dplyr::bind_cols()和管道:

library(dplyr)

tibble(a = 1:5,
       b = LETTERS[1:5]) %>%
bind_cols(., setNames(lapply(new_vars, function(x) x = NA), new_vars))

结果:

# A tibble: 5 × 5
      a b     foo   bar   bar2 
  <int> <chr> <lgl> <lgl> <lgl>
1     1 A     NA    NA    NA   
2     2 B     NA    NA    NA   
3     3 C     NA    NA    NA   
4     4 D     NA    NA    NA   
5     5 E     NA    NA    NA

虽然我认为这个问题第二个答案也很好。

如果你真的想要使用mutate,Ritchie在评论中的答案也可以。

英文:

Using dplyr::bind_cols() and pipes:

library(dplyr)

tibble(a = 1:5,
       b = LETTERS[1:5]) %&gt;% 
bind_cols(., setNames(lapply(new_vars, function(x) x = NA), new_vars))

Result:

# A tibble: 5 &#215; 5
      a b     foo   bar   bar2 
  &lt;int&gt; &lt;chr&gt; &lt;lgl&gt; &lt;lgl&gt; &lt;lgl&gt;
1     1 A     NA    NA    NA   
2     2 B     NA    NA    NA   
3     3 C     NA    NA    NA   
4     4 D     NA    NA    NA   
5     5 E     NA    NA    NA

Although I think the second answer to this question, on which this is based, is just as good.

If you really want mutate, Ritchie's answer in the comments works.

答案4

得分: 1

也许这是你正在寻找的样式:

library(dplyr)

dat <- tibble(
    a = 1:5,
    b = LETTERS[1:5]
)

new_vars <- c("foo", "bar", "bar2")

dat %>% 
    purrr::reduce(new_vars, ~mutate(.x, {{.y}} := 0), .init = .)

我们使用purrr::reduce()而不是使用across(),它将循环遍历new_vars。我们将mutate函数应用于上一次迭代的输出。我们想要以.init = dat开始,但我们将其作为管道输入。

如果你想为每个new_vars设置不同的值,甚至可以使用reduce2

英文:

Maybe this is the style you're looking for:

library(dplyr)

dat &lt;- tibble(
	a = 1:5,
	b = LETTERS[1:5]
)

new_vars &lt;- c(&quot;foo&quot;, &quot;bar&quot;, &quot;bar2&quot;)

dat %&gt;% 
	purrr::reduce(new_vars, ~mutate(.x, {{.y}} := 0), .init = .)

Instead of using across() we use purrr::reduce() which will loop over the new_vars. We apply the mutate function to the output of the previous iteration. We want to start with .init = dat, but we pipe it in.

You could even use reduce2 if you wanted to have different values for each of the new_vars.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年8月9日 08:45:13
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76863910.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定