无法在 Long 数据类型上使用 .to() 运算符。

huangapple go评论49阅读模式
英文:

Unable to use .to() operator on Long data type

问题

The code you provided is in Scala and seems to have an issue with the to() method, which expects an Int as the upper bound. To work with a Long range, you can use the to method with Long ranges. Here's a corrected version of your code:

@main def m(): Unit = {
  var largest = 0L;
  val num = 600851475143L;
  (2L to num - 1).foreach(arg =>
    if (num % arg == 0 && largest < arg) {
      var flag = true;
      (2L to arg - 1).foreach(arg2 =>
        if (arg % arg2 == 0) flag = false
      );
      if (flag) largest = arg;
    }
  )
  println(largest);
}

By using 2L and arg.to(arg - 1) for Long ranges, you should be able to avoid the error related to the Long datatype.

英文:

The question is:
The prime factors of 13195 are 5, 7, 13 and 29.
What is the largest prime factor of the number 600851475143?

I have written a code for it but it gives an error.The code is written in Scala.

@main def m(): Unit = {
  var largest = 0L;
  val num = 600851475143L;
  2.to(num - 1).foreach(arg =&gt;
    if num % arg == 0 &amp;&amp; largest &lt; arg then
      var flag = true;
      2.to(arg - 1).foreach(arg2 =&gt;
        if arg % arg2 == 0 then flag = false);
      if flag then largest = arg;
  )
  println(largest);
}

The code gives an error of:
Found: Long
Required: Int
2.to(num - 1).foreach(arg =>

How can we use .to() operator for Long datatype? It seems like we are only allowed to use Int.

I tried type casting the long to the Int but it resulted in the answer getting 0.

答案1

得分: 4

以下是您要翻译的内容:

"While number in a Range can be Longs, they cannot contain more than Int.MaxValue values (docs):

Any method that could require a collection of over Int.MaxValue length to be created, or could be asked to index beyond Int.MaxValue elements will throw an exception.

You can create a lazy Iterator that spans all numbers from 2L to a Long greater than Int.MaxValue as follows:

Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ < max)

So in your code this would be the following:

@main def m(): Unit = {
  var largest = 0L;
  val num = 600851475143L;
  
  Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ < (num - 1)).foreach(arg =>
    if num % arg == 0 && largest < arg then
      var flag = true;
      Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ < (arg - 1)).foreach(arg2 =>
        if arg % arg2 == 0 then flag = false);
      if flag then largest = arg;
  )
  println(largest);
}

A few additional notes:

  • you can drop the semicolons if you want, they are not needed in Scala
  • producing the range lazily is a bit of a mouthful, it's probably best to give it a name
  • you can use for-comprehensions as a way to express looping (what you are achieving with foreach)

Given this, one way to re-write your program could be the following:

def range(from: Long, to: Long, step: Long = 1) = {
  require(from < to)
  Iterator.iterate(from)(_ + step).takeWhile(_ < to)
}

var largest = 0L;
val num = 600851475143L;

for (arg <- range(from = 2L, to = num - 1)) {
  if num % arg == 0 && largest < arg then
    var flag = true
    for (arg2 <- range(from = 2L, to = arg - 1)) {
      if arg % arg2 == 0 then flag = false
    }
    if flag then largest = arg
}

println(largest)

The for-comprehension above is entirely equivalent to a foreach. They are particularly useful when you need to nest multiple flatMaps and close with a map or a foreach to make the code less nested and possibly easier to read. You can read more about them in the documentation.

You can play around with this code here on Scastie. Maybe consider giving your variables names more meaningful than arg, arg2 and flag as well to improve the readability.

As a final note, more important than anything, your algorithm can probably be improved in terms of time complexity, but that's something you want to spent some time on by yourself. 无法在 Long 数据类型上使用 .to() 运算符。

英文:

While number in a Range can be Longs, they cannot contain more than Int.MaxValue values (docs):

> Any method that could require a collection of over Int.MaxValue length to be created, or could be asked to index beyond Int.MaxValue elements will throw an exception.

You can create a lazy Iterator that spans all numbers from 2L to a Long greater than Int.MaxValue as follows:

Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ &lt; max)

So in your code this would be the following:

@main def m(): Unit = {
  var largest = 0L;
  val num = 600851475143L;
  
  Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ &lt; (num - 1)).foreach(arg =&gt;
    if num % arg == 0 &amp;&amp; largest &lt; arg then
      var flag = true;
      Iterator.iterate(2L)(_ + 1).takeWhile(_ &lt; (arg - 1)).foreach(arg2 =&gt;
        if arg % arg2 == 0 then flag = false);
      if flag then largest = arg;
  )
  println(largest);
}

A few additional notes:

  • you can drop the semicolons if you want, they are not needed in Scala
  • producing the range lazily is a bit of a mouthful, it's probably best to give it a name
  • you can use for-comprehensions as a way to express looping (what you are achieving with foreach)

Given this, one way to re-write your program could be the following:

def range(from: Long, to: Long, step: Long = 1) = {
  require(from &lt; to)
  Iterator.iterate(from)(_ + step).takeWhile(_ &lt; to)
}

var largest = 0L;
val num = 600851475143L;

for (arg &lt;- range(from = 2L, to = num - 1)) {
  if num % arg == 0 &amp;&amp; largest &lt; arg then
    var flag = true
    for (arg2 &lt;- range(from = 2L, to = arg - 1)) {
      if arg % arg2 == 0 then flag = false
    }
    if flag then largest = arg
}

println(largest)

The for-comprehension above is entirely equivalent to a foreach. They are particularly useful when you need to nest multiple flatMaps and close with a map or a foreach to make the code less nested and possibly easier to read. You can read more about them in the documentation.

You can play around with this code here on Scastie. Maybe consider giving your variables names more meaningful than arg, arg2 and flag as well to improve the readability.

As a final note, more important than anything, your algorithm can probably be improved in terms of time complexity, but that's something you want to spent some time on by yourself. 无法在 Long 数据类型上使用 .to() 运算符。

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月13日 08:42:23
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76461068.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定