问题

我试图检查值是否存在于R中使用%in%运算符的一系列数字中。该序列是使用seq()函数生成的，步长为0.01，范围从0.50到1.10。

这里是我尝试过的不同输入：

.55 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
.57 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

&quot;.55&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
&quot;.57&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

&quot;0.55&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
&quot;0.57&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

0.55 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
0.57 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

然而，对这些输入的输出令人困惑和意外：

[1] TRUE
[1] FALSE

[1] FALSE
[1] FALSE

[1] TRUE
[1] TRUE

[1] TRUE
[1] FALSE

有人知道为什么.55被识别在序列中，但.57不被识别吗？
为什么当我们加一个前导零并加上引号时返回TRUE？
为什么没有前导零的引号返回FALSE？

英文:

I am trying to check if values are present in a sequence of numbers using the %in% operator in R. The sequence is generated using the seq() function with a step of 0.01, ranging from 0.50 to 1.10.

Here are the different inputs I tried:

.55 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
.57 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

&quot;.55&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
&quot;.57&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

&quot;0.55&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
&quot;0.57&quot; %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

0.55 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)
0.57 %in% seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01)

However, the outputs for these inputs are confusing and unexpected:

[1] TRUE
[1] FALSE

[1] FALSE
[1] FALSE

[1] TRUE
[1] TRUE

[1] TRUE
[1] FALSE

Does anyone know why .55 is recognized in the sequence, but .57 isn't?
How come when we add a leading zero and put quotes it returns TRUE?
How come quotes without a leading zero returns FALSE?

答案1

得分: 3

关于你第一个问题的答案是，将浮点数进行精确相等比较是不安全的 - 请参见“为什么这些数字不相等？”

对于你第二个问题的答案是，seq 中的数字被转换为字符进行比较，序列的字符输出会显示在控制台上，如果我们执行：

as.character(seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01))
#>  [1] &quot;0.5&quot;  &quot;0.51&quot; &quot;0.52&quot; &quot;0.53&quot; &quot;0.54&quot; &quot;0.55&quot; &quot;0.56&quot; &quot;0.57&quot; &quot;0.58&quot; &quot;0.59&quot; &quot;0.6&quot; 
#> [12] &quot;0.61&quot; &quot;0.62&quot; &quot;0.63&quot; &quot;0.64&quot; &quot;0.65&quot; &quot;0.66&quot; &quot;0.67&quot; &quot;0.68&quot; &quot;0.69&quot; &quot;0.7&quot;  &quot;0.71&quot;
#> [23] &quot;0.72&quot; &quot;0.73&quot; &quot;0.74&quot; &quot;0.75&quot; &quot;0.76&quot; &quot;0.77&quot; &quot;0.78&quot; &quot;0.79&quot; &quot;0.8&quot;  &quot;0.81&quot; &quot;0.82&quot;
#> [34] &quot;0.83&quot; &quot;0.84&quot; &quot;0.85&quot; &quot;0.86&quot; &quot;0.87&quot; &quot;0.88&quot; &quot;0.89&quot; &quot;0.9&quot;  &quot;0.91&quot; &quot;0.92&quot; &quot;0.93&quot;
#> [45] &quot;0.94&quot; &quot;0.95&quot; &quot;0.96&quot; &quot;0.97&quot; &quot;0.98&quot; &quot;0.99&quot; &quot;1&quot;    &quot;1.01&quot; &quot;1.02&quot; &quot;1.03&quot; &quot;1.04&quot;
#> [56] &quot;1.05&quot; &quot;1.06&quot; &quot;1.07&quot; &quot;1.08&quot; &quot;1.09&quot; &quot;1.1&quot;

注意这里都包含字符串 "0.55" 和 "0.57"。

对于你第三个问题的答案很简单，字符串 ".55" 和 ".57" 不会出现在上面的结果中。

英文:

The answer to your first question is that it is not safe to compare floating point numbers for exact equality - see "Why are these numbers not equal?"

The answer to your second question is that the numbers in seq are converted to characters for the comparison, and the character output of the sequence is what is shown in the console if we do:

as.character(seq(.50, 1.1, by = .01))
#&gt;  [1] &quot;0.5&quot;  &quot;0.51&quot; &quot;0.52&quot; &quot;0.53&quot; &quot;0.54&quot; &quot;0.55&quot; &quot;0.56&quot; &quot;0.57&quot; &quot;0.58&quot; &quot;0.59&quot; &quot;0.6&quot; 
#&gt; [12] &quot;0.61&quot; &quot;0.62&quot; &quot;0.63&quot; &quot;0.64&quot; &quot;0.65&quot; &quot;0.66&quot; &quot;0.67&quot; &quot;0.68&quot; &quot;0.69&quot; &quot;0.7&quot;  &quot;0.71&quot;
#&gt; [23] &quot;0.72&quot; &quot;0.73&quot; &quot;0.74&quot; &quot;0.75&quot; &quot;0.76&quot; &quot;0.77&quot; &quot;0.78&quot; &quot;0.79&quot; &quot;0.8&quot;  &quot;0.81&quot; &quot;0.82&quot;
#&gt; [34] &quot;0.83&quot; &quot;0.84&quot; &quot;0.85&quot; &quot;0.86&quot; &quot;0.87&quot; &quot;0.88&quot; &quot;0.89&quot; &quot;0.9&quot;  &quot;0.91&quot; &quot;0.92&quot; &quot;0.93&quot;
#&gt; [45] &quot;0.94&quot; &quot;0.95&quot; &quot;0.96&quot; &quot;0.97&quot; &quot;0.98&quot; &quot;0.99&quot; &quot;1&quot;    &quot;1.01&quot; &quot;1.02&quot; &quot;1.03&quot; &quot;1.04&quot;
#&gt; [56] &quot;1.05&quot; &quot;1.06&quot; &quot;1.07&quot; &quot;1.08&quot; &quot;1.09&quot; &quot;1.1&quot;

Note that the strings "0.55" and "0.57" are both present here.

The answer to your third question is simply that the strings ".55" and ".57" do not appear in the above result.

通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。

一些元素在使用 %in% seq() 时不会显示为序列的成员。

问题

答案1

如何使用rvest包在R中从网络抓取的数据中提取和显示图像？

如何在单个数据集中将多个列进行 “left_join” 合并为一列？

分割字符串，不考虑特殊字符。

为什么在遍历 R 数据框的列时比遍历等价向量花费更长时间？

What's the correct way to type hint an empty list as a literal in python?

如何在Highcharts Gantt中更改本地化的星期名称

如何在同一个流中使用多个过滤器和映射函数？

如何使用Map/Set来将代码优化到O(n)？

.NET MAUI Android在GitHub Actions上构建失败，错误代码为1。

如何在Playwright视觉比较中屏蔽多个定位器？

在C++中，可以使用可变模板参数来检索类型的内部类型。

selenium.common.exceptions.StaleElementReferenceException: Message: stale element reference: stale element not found

Creating and opening a URL to log in to Website via Basic Auth with Robot Framework/Selenium (Python)

AG Grid 在上下文菜单中以大文本形式打开

发表评论