提高使用bufio.NewScanner读取性能的方法

huangapple go评论79阅读模式
英文:

Improving performance of reading with bufio.NewScanner

问题

一个简单的程序,用于实现一个目标:

  1. 逐行读取脚本文件,创建一个字符串,忽略任何空白行或注释(包括shebang)。如果需要,在行尾添加一个分号。 (我知道,我知道,反斜杠和和号等)

我的问题是:

如何提高这个小程序的性能?在另一个答案中,我读到了利用scanner.Bytes()而不是scanner.Text(),但这似乎不可行,因为我需要的是一个字符串。

带有测试文件的示例代码:https://play.golang.org/p/gzSTLkP3BoB

这是简单的程序:

func main() {
	file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatalln(err)
	}
	defer file.Close()

	var a strings.Builder
	scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)

	for scanner.Scan() {
		lines := scanner.Text()

		switch {
		case lines == "" || lines[:1] == "#":
			continue
		case lines[len(lines)-1:] != ";":
			a.WriteString(lines + "; ")
		default:
			a.WriteString(lines + " ")
		}
	}

	fmt.Println(a.String())
}
英文:

A simple program to serve one purpose:

  1. Read a script file line by line, create a string while ignoring any blank new lines or comments (including the shebang). Adding a ';' at the end of a line if needed. (I know, I know, backslashes and ampersands, etc)

My question is:

How to improve the performance of this small program? In a different answer I've read about utilizing scanner.Bytes() instead of scanner.Text(), but this doesn't seem feasible as a string is what I want.

Sample code with test file: https://play.golang.org/p/gzSTLkP3BoB

Here is the simple program:

func main() {
	file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatalln(err)
	}
	defer file.Close()

	var a strings.Builder
	scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)

	for scanner.Scan() {
		lines := scanner.Text()

		switch {
		case lines == "" || lines[:1] == "#":
			continue
		case lines[len(lines)-1:] != ";":
			a.WriteString(lines + "; ")
		default:
			a.WriteString(lines + " ")
		}
	}

	fmt.Println(a.String())
}

答案1

得分: 2

我使用了strings.Builderioutil.ReadAll来提高性能。由于你处理的是小型shell脚本,我假设一次性读取整个文件不会对内存造成压力(我使用了ioutil.ReadAll)。我还只分配了一次内存,为strings.Builder提供足够的存储空间,从而减少了内存分配。

现在,让我们来看一下基准测试结果:

goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: test
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1038NG7 CPU @ 2.00GHz
BenchmarkDoFast-8   	  342602	      3334 ns/op	    1280 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoSlow-8   	  258896	      4408 ns/op	    4624 B/op	       8 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	test	2.477s

我们可以看到,doFast不仅更快,而且分配的内存更少。度量指标越低越好。

package main

import (
	"bufio"
	"bytes"
	"fmt"
	"io/ioutil"
	"os"
	"strings"
)

func open(filename string) (*os.File, error) {
	return os.Open(filename)
}

func main() {
	fd, err := open("test.sh")
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	defer fd.Close()

	outputA, err := doFast(fd)
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	fd.Seek(0, 0)
	outputB, err := doSlow(fd)
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	fmt.Println(outputA)
	fmt.Println(outputB)
}

func doFast(fd *os.File) (string, error) {
	b, err := ioutil.ReadAll(fd)
	if err != nil {
		return "", err
	}

	var res strings.Builder
	res.Grow(len(b))

	bLines := bytes.Split(b, []byte("\n"))

	for i := range bLines {
		switch {
		case len(bLines[i]) == 0 || bLines[i][0] == '#':
		case bLines[i][len(bLines[i])-1] != ';':
			res.Write(bLines[i])
			res.WriteString("; ")
		default:
			res.Write(bLines[i])
			res.WriteByte(' ')
		}
	}

	return res.String(), nil
}

func doSlow(fd *os.File) (string, error) {
	var a strings.Builder
	scanner := bufio.NewScanner(fd)

	for scanner.Scan() {
		lines := scanner.Text()

		switch {
		case lines == "" || lines[:1] == "#":
			continue
		case lines[len(lines)-1:] != ";":
			a.WriteString(lines + "; ")
		default:
			a.WriteString(lines + " ")
		}
	}

	return a.String(), nil
}

注意:我没有使用bufio.NewScanner,它是否是必需的?

英文:

I used strings.Builder and ioutil.ReadAll to improve the performance. As you are dealing with small shell scripts I assumed that read the file all at once should not put pressure on memory (I used ioutil.ReadAll). I also allocated just once to make sufficient store for strings.Builder — reduced allocations.

  • doFast: faster implementation
  • doSlow: slower implementation (what you've originally done)

Now, let's look at the benchmark results:

goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: test
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1038NG7 CPU @ 2.00GHz
BenchmarkDoFast-8   	  342602	      3334 ns/op	    1280 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoSlow-8   	  258896	      4408 ns/op	    4624 B/op	       8 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	test	2.477s

We can see that doFast is not only faster but only makes lesser allocations. Metrics measured are lower the better.

package main
import (
"bufio"
"bytes"
"fmt"
"io/ioutil"
"os"
"strings"
)
func open(filename string) (*os.File, error) {
return os.Open(filename)
}
func main() {
fd, err := open("test.sh")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
defer fd.Close()
outputA, err := doFast(fd)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fd.Seek(0, 0)
outputB, err := doSlow(fd)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Println(outputA)
fmt.Println(outputB)
}
func doFast(fd *os.File) (string, error) {
b, err := ioutil.ReadAll(fd)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
var res strings.Builder
res.Grow(len(b))
bLines := bytes.Split(b, []byte("\n"))
for i := range bLines {
switch {
case len(bLines[i]) == 0 || bLines[i][0] == '#':
case bLines[i][len(bLines[i])-1] != ';':
res.Write(bLines[i])
res.WriteString("; ")
default:
res.Write(bLines[i])
res.WriteByte(' ')
}
}
return res.String(), nil
}
func doSlow(fd *os.File) (string, error) {
var a strings.Builder
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(fd)
for scanner.Scan() {
lines := scanner.Text()
switch {
case lines == "" || lines[:1] == "#":
continue
case lines[len(lines)-1:] != ";":
a.WriteString(lines + "; ")
default:
a.WriteString(lines + " ")
}
}
return a.String(), nil
}

Note: I didn't use bufio.NewScanner; is it required?

答案2

得分: 1

使用scanner.Bytes()是可行的。以下是代码:

func main() {
    file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalln(err)
    }
    defer file.Close()

    var a strings.Builder
    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        lines := scanner.Bytes()

        switch {
        case len(lines) == 0 || lines[0] == '#':
            continue
        case lines[len(lines)-1] != ';':
            a.Write(lines)
            a.WriteString("; ")
        default:
            a.Write(lines)
            a.WriteByte(' ')
        }
    }

    fmt.Println(a.String())
}

该程序避免了在scanner.Text()中进行字符串分配。如果程序的速度受到I/O限制,那么实际上该程序可能不会更快。

在 playground 上运行

如果你的目标是将结果写入标准输出(stdout),那么可以使用bufio.Writer而不是strings.Builder来进行写入。这个改变将strings.Builder中的一个或多个分配替换为bufio.Writer中的单个分配。

func main() {
    file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatalln(err)
    }
    defer file.Close()

    a := bufio.NewWriter(os.Stdout)
    defer a.Flush() // 在 main 函数返回时刷新缓冲区中的数据。

    scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)

    for scanner.Scan() {
        lines := scanner.Bytes()

        switch {
        case len(lines) == 0 || lines[0] == '#':
            continue
        case lines[len(lines)-1] != ';':
            a.Write(lines)
            a.WriteString("; ")
        default:
            a.Write(lines)
            a.WriteByte(' ')
        }
    }
}

在 playground 上运行

额外的改进:使用lines := bytes.TrimSpace(scanner.Bytes())来处理#之前和;之后的空白字符。

英文:

It is feasible to use scanner.Bytes(). Here's the code:

func main() {
file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
if err != nil {
log.Fatalln(err)
}
defer file.Close()
var a strings.Builder
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
for scanner.Scan() {
lines := scanner.Bytes()
switch {
case len(lines) == 0 || lines[0] == '#':
continue
case lines[len(lines)-1] != ';':
a.Write(lines)
a.WriteString("; ")
default:
a.Write(lines)
a.WriteByte(' ')
}
}
fmt.Println(a.String())
}

This program avoids the string allocation in scanner.Text(). The program may not be faster in practice if the program speed is limited by I/O.

Run it on the playground.

If your goal is to write the result to stdout, then write to a bufio.Writer instead of a strings.Builder. This change replaces one or more allocations in strings.Builder with a single allocation in bufio.Writer.

func main() {
file, err := os.Open("./script.sh")
if err != nil {
log.Fatalln(err)
}
defer file.Close()
a := bufio.NewWriter(os.Stdout)
defer a.Flush() // flush buffered data on return from main.
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(file)
for scanner.Scan() {
lines := scanner.Bytes()
switch {
case len(lines) == 0 || lines[0] == '#':
continue
case lines[len(lines)-1] != ';':
a.Write(lines)
a.WriteString("; ")
default:
a.Write(lines)
a.WriteByte(' ')
}
}
}

Run it on the playground.

Bonus improvement: use lines := bytes.TrimSpace(scanner.Bytes()) to handle whitespace before a '#' and after a ';'

答案3

得分: 0

你可以通过对输出进行缓冲来提高性能。

func main() {
  output := bufio.NewWriter(os.Stdout)

  // 使用 fmt.Fprintf 替代 Printf
  fmt.Fprintf(output, "%s\n", a)
}
英文:

You may be able to improve performance by buffering the output as well.

func main() {
  output := bufio.NewWriter(os.Stdout)

  // instead of Printf, use
  fmt.Fprintf(output, "%s\n", a)
}

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2021年6月25日 10:46:48
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/68124797.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定