英文:
using reflection in Go to get the name of a struct
问题
我找到了这个问题和这些很好的答案:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20170275/how-to-find-a-type-of-a-object-in-golang
我尝试按照答案的方法来获取结构体的名称:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type Ab struct {
}
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
return reflect.TypeOf(myvar).Name()
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, playground")
tst := "string"
tst2 := 10
tst3 := 1.2
tst4 := new(Ab)
fmt.Println(getType(tst))
fmt.Println(getType(tst2))
fmt.Println(getType(tst3))
fmt.Println(getType(tst4))
}
Go playground: http://play.golang.org/p/tD8mygvETH
但是输出结果是:
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Program exited.
期望的输出结果应该是:
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Ab
Program exited.
我尝试通过阅读文档来找出问题所在,但没有找到关于这个问题的解释。所以,对于这个非常普遍的问题,我很抱歉,但是:
为什么 reflect.TypeOf().Name()
在这个结构体中不起作用?
英文:
I found this question with this great answers:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20170275/how-to-find-a-type-of-a-object-in-golang
I played around with the answer and tried to get the name of a struct in the same way:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type Ab struct {
}
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
return reflect.TypeOf(myvar).Name()
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, playground")
tst := "string"
tst2 := 10
tst3 := 1.2
tst4 := new(Ab)
fmt.Println(getType(tst))
fmt.Println(getType(tst2))
fmt.Println(getType(tst3))
fmt.Println(getType(tst4))
}
Go playground: http://play.golang.org/p/tD8mygvETH
But the output is:
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Program exited.
Expected output would be:
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Ab
Program exited.
I tried to figure out by reading the documentation but didn't find the issue about that. So, sorry for the very general question, but:
What's the reason, reflect.TypeOf().Name()
does not work with (this) struct(s)?
答案1
得分: 86
在你的示例中,你传递的是指针类型的值(*Ab
),而不是结构体类型。
使用Type.Name()
如果不是指针类型,Type.Name()
将正确返回Ab
。对于指针类型,如果你仍然想要结构体的名称,可以使用Type.Elem()
来获取元素的类型:
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
if t := reflect.TypeOf(myvar); t.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
return "*" + t.Elem().Name()
} else {
return t.Name()
}
}
测试一下:
tst4 := Ab{}
tst5 := new(Ab)
fmt.Println(getType(tst4))
fmt.Println(getType(tst5))
输出结果(在Go Playground上尝试你修改后的示例):
Ab
*Ab
注意:
请注意,由于Type.Name()
不解析指针,如果传递的值是指向指针的指针,例如**Ab
,它将无法工作,而Type.String()
会自动解析指针,因此在这种情况下也可以工作。
我们可以很容易地使我们的getType()
函数适用于**Ab
(或任意深度的指针):
func getType(myvar interface{}) (res string) {
t := reflect.TypeOf(myvar)
for t.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
t = t.Elem()
res += "*"
}
return res + t.Name()
}
使用这个函数的值:
tst4 := Ab{}
tst5 := new(Ab)
tst6 := &tst5 // **Ab的类型
tst7 := &tst6 // ***Ab的类型
输出结果(在Go Playground上尝试):
Ab
*Ab
**Ab
***Ab
使用Type.String()
一个更简单更好的方法是使用Type.String()
而不是Type.Name()
,它会自动处理指针,并且包括包名。例如:
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
return reflect.TypeOf(myvar).String()
}
对于修改后的示例,它的输出结果是:
string
int
float64
main.Ab
*main.Ab
在Go Playground上尝试这个变体。
英文:
In your example you pass a value of pointer type (*Ab
), not a struct type.
Sticking to Type.Name()
If it is not a pointer, Type.Name()
will properly return Ab
. In case of pointer if you still want the struct's name, you can use Type.Elem()
to get the element's type:
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
if t := reflect.TypeOf(myvar); t.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
return "*" + t.Elem().Name()
} else {
return t.Name()
}
}
Testing it:
tst4 := Ab{}
tst5 := new(Ab)
fmt.Println(getType(tst4))
fmt.Println(getType(tst5))
Output (try your modified example on the Go Playground):
Ab
*Ab
Note:
Note that as Type.Name()
does not resolve pointers, it would not work if the value passed is a pointer to pointer, e.g. **Ab
, while as Type.String()
automatically resolves pointers, would work in this case too.
We can easily make our getType()
function to work with **Ab
too (or with any depth of pointers):
func getType(myvar interface{}) (res string) {
t := reflect.TypeOf(myvar)
for t.Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
t = t.Elem()
res += "*"
}
return res + t.Name()
}
Calling it with values:
tst4 := Ab{}
tst5 := new(Ab)
tst6 := &tst5 // type of **Ab
tst7 := &tst6 // type of ***Ab
Output (try it on the Go Playground):
Ab
*Ab
**Ab
***Ab
Using Type.String()
A simpler and better approach would be to use Type.String()
instead of Type.Name()
which automatically handles pointers and also includes package name. E.g.:
func getType(myvar interface{}) string {
return reflect.TypeOf(myvar).String()
}
For the modified example it outputs:
string
int
float64
main.Ab
*main.Ab
Try this variant on the Go Playground.
答案2
得分: 21
fmt还有一个很酷的%T
标签
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
)
type Potato struct {
}
func main() {
fmt.Printf("我有一个%T,一个%T和一个%T\n", Potato{}, http.StatusMultipleChoices, &http.Response{})
}
输出结果为我有一个main.Potato,一个int和一个*http.Response
链接:https://play.golang.org/p/6z7_0BSitm
英文:
fmt has a cool %T
tag as well
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
)
type Potato struct {
}
func main() {
fmt.Printf("I have a %T, an %T and a %T\n", Potato{}, http.StatusMultipleChoices, &http.Response{})
}
outputs I have a main.Potato, an int and a *http.Response
https://play.golang.org/p/6z7_0BSitm
答案3
得分: 4
问题是new
返回指针,以下代码应该得到期望的结果。
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type Ab struct {
}
func getType(myvar interface{}) {
valueOf := reflect.ValueOf(myvar)
if valueOf.Type().Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
fmt.Println(reflect.Indirect(valueOf).Type().Name())
} else {
fmt.Println(valueOf.Type().Name())
}
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, playground")
tst := "string"
tst2 := 10
tst3 := 1.2
tst4 := new(Ab)
getType(tst)
getType(tst2)
getType(tst3)
getType(tst4)
}
输出结果为:
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Ab
英文:
The problem is new
returns pointer, following should get the desired result.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type Ab struct {
}
func getType(myvar interface{}) {
valueOf := reflect.ValueOf(myvar)
if valueOf.Type().Kind() == reflect.Ptr {
fmt.Println(reflect.Indirect(valueOf).Type().Name())
} else {
fmt.Println(valueOf.Type().Name())
}
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Hello, playground")
tst := "string"
tst2 := 10
tst3 := 1.2
tst4 := new(Ab)
getType(tst)
getType(tst2)
getType(tst3)
getType(tst4)
}
Output is
Hello, playground
string
int
float64
Ab
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库,让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论