Adding a func never called improves behavior?

The code below produces undesirable

> [20010101 20010102].

When uncommenting the String func it produces better (but not my implementation):

> [{20010101 1.5} {20010102 2.5}]

However that String func is never called.
I see that Date in DateValue is anonymous and therefore func (Date) String is being used by DateValue.

So my questions are:

1. Is this a language issue, a fmt.Println implementation issue, or
   something else? Note: if I switch from:

   func (*DateValue) String() string

to

func (DateValue) String() string

my function is at least called and panic ensues. So if I really want my method called I could do that, but assume DateValue is really a very large object which I only want to pass by reference.

2. What is a good strategy for mixing anonymous fields with
   functionality like Stringer and json encoding that use reflection
   under the covers? For example adding a String or MarshalJSON method
   for a type that happens to be used as an anonymous field can cause
   strange behavior (like you only print or encode part of the whole).

   package main

   import (
   "fmt"
   "time"
   )

   type Date int64

   func (d Date) String() string {
   t := time.Unix(int64(d),0).UTC()
   return fmt.Sprintf("%04d%02d%02d", t.Year(), int(t.Month()), t.Day())
   }

   type DateValue struct {
   Date
   Value float64
   }

   type OrderedValues []DateValue

   /*
   // ADD THIS BACK and note that this is never called but both pieces of
   // DateValue are printed, whereas, without this only the date is printed
   func (dv *DateValue) String() string {
   panic("Oops")
   return fmt.Sprintf("DV(%s,%f)", dv.Date, dv.Value )
   }
   */

   func main() {
   d1, d2 := Date(978307200),Date(978307200+246060)
   ov1 := OrderedValues{{ d1, 1.5 }, { d2, 2.5 }}
   fmt.Println(ov1)
   }

It's because you've passed in a slice of DateValues and not DateValue pointers. Since you've defined the String method for *DataValue, *DateValue is what fulfills the Stringer interface. This also prevents DateValue from fulfilling the Stringer interface via its anonymous Date member, because only one of either the value type (DateValue) or the pointer type (*DateValue) can be used to fulfill an interface. So, when fmt.Println is printing the contents of the slice, it sees that the elements are not Stringers, and uses the default struct formatting instead of the method you defined, giving [{20010101 1.5} {20010102 2.5}].

You can either make OrderedValues a []*DateValue or define func (dv DateValue) String() string instead of the pointer version.

Based on what @SteveM said, I distilled it to a simpler test case:

package main

import "fmt"

type Fooable interface {
  Foo()
}

type A int

func (a A) Foo() { }

type B struct {
  A
}

// Uncomment the following method and it will print false
//func (b *B) Foo() { }

func main() {
  var x interface{} = B{}
  _, ok := x.(Fooable)
  fmt.Println(ok) // prints true
}

In other words, the Foo method is not part of the method set of B when the Foo method for *B is defined.

From reading the spec, I don't see a clear explanation of what is happening. The closest part seems to be in the section on selectors:

> For a value x of type T or *T where T is not an interface type, x.f
> denotes the field or method at the shallowest depth in T where there
> is such an f.

The only way I can see this explaining what is going on is if when it is looking for a method Foo at shallowest depth in B, it takes into consideration the methods for *B too, for some reason (even though we are considering type B not *B); and the Foo in *B is indeed shallower than the Foo in A, so it takes that one as the candidate; and then it sees that that Foo doesn't work, since it's in *B and not B, so it gets rid of Foo altogether (even though there is a valid one inherited from A).

If this is indeed what is going on, then I agree with the OP in that this is very counter-intuitive that adding a method to *B would have the reverse consequence of removing a method from B.

Maybe someone more familiar with Go can clarify this.