PowerShell -as [Type] 语法

huangapple go评论98阅读模式
英文:

PowerShell -as [Type] syntax

问题

我在Get-FileHash函数中发现了以下语句(来源:Microsoft.PowerShell.Utility.psm1):

$hasherType = "System.Security.Cryptography.${Algorithm}CryptoServiceProvider" -as [Type]

我的问题是:

  1. 写"-as [Type]"和简单写"[Type]$xxxx"之间有什么区别(如果有的话)?
  2. ${Algorithm}也可以定义为:$($Algorithm) 吗?
英文:

I found in the Get-FileHash function (source: Microsoft.PowerShell.Utility.psm1) this statement:

$hasherType = "System.Security.Cryptography.${Algorithm}CryptoServiceProvider" -as [Type]

my questions are:

  1. what is the difference (if any) writing "-as [Type]" or just simply "[Type]$xxxx?
  2. ${Algorithm} could be defined as well: $($Algorithm)?

答案1

得分: 3

  • 使用-as [Type]或者只是简单地使用[Type]$xxxx有什么区别(如果有的话)?

-as操作符受到了C#中的所谓无检查转换操作符的启发(对应于C#关键字as) - 在转换失败的情况下,该操作将简单地评估为$null。这种行为与常规的[type]$value转换不同,后者在失败时会引发异常。

测试$null通常比捕获和处理异常更快,因此在预期某些值不符合给定类型的情况下,这可能会有用:

$bunchOfMixedValues | ForEach-Object {
  $thing = $_ -as [TargetType]
  if ($null -ne $thing) {
    # 处理 $thing
  }
  else {
    # 无需关心无效输入,什么都不做
  }
}
  • ${Algorithm} 也可以这样定义:$($Algorithm)吗?

最终结果是相同的,是的。

${...}表示与$...完全相同的元素 - 变量路径文字表达式。您可以将{}括号视为变量表达式的_引号_,换句话说,它们_限定了_变量名称的边界 - 因此PowerShell知道不要尝试展开$AlgorithmCryptoServiceProvider。因此,在生成代码时使用${...}语法更安全,这就是为什么在许多由Microsoft编写的模块中看到它的原因。

英文:

> what is the difference (if any) writing -as [Type] or just simply [Type]$xxxx?

The -as operator is heavily inspired by the so-called unchecked conversion operator from C# (corresponding to the C# keyword as) - the operation will simply evaluate to $null in case of conversion failure. This behavior differs significantly from a regular [type]$value cast, which will throw an exception on failure.

Testing for $null is usually faster than capturing and handling an exception, so this can be useful in situations where you expect some values not to conform to a given type:

$bunchOfMixedValues |ForEach-Object {
  $thing = $_ -as [TargetType]
  if ($null -ne $thing) {
    # process $thing
  }
  else {
    # no need to care about invalid input, do nothing
  }
}

> ${Algorithm} could be defined as well: $($Algorithm)?

The end result would be the same, yes.

${...} represents the exact same element as $... - a variable path literal expression. You can think of the { and } brackets as quotation marks for variable expressions, in other words they qualify the boundary of the variable name - so PowerShell knows not to attempt to expand $AlgorithmCryptoServiceProvider instead.

It's therefore safer to use the ${...} syntax when generating code for example, which is why you'll see it in lots of Microsoft-authored modules.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年8月10日 15:59:06
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76873711.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定