英文:
Which part of the CSS spec describes the behavior when a space is inserted at the beginning of innerHTML?
问题
我明白了，你只需要代码部分的翻译。以下是翻译好的内容：
<html>
<head>
<style>
section { height: 120px; background: gray; width: 100px; font-size: 100px;}
div { display: inline-block; }
.a { background: red ; height: 50px; width: 20px}
.b { background: cyan; height: 50px; width: 20px}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<section> <div class="a"></div><div class="b"></div></section>
</body>
</html>
英文:
Question:
Which part of the official CSS spec (from csswg.org or w3.org) describes the behavior when a space is inserted at the beginning of innerHTML?
In the following experiment, Chrome produces a different result from JsFiddle. Who is correct?
Thanks!
Results in Chrome/Firefox/Edge:
Results in JsFiddle/CodePen:
https://jsfiddle.net/emmaJsFiddle/g6qjy8fd/11/
Appendix 2: Source Code:
<html>
<head>
<style>
section { height: 120px; background: gray; width: 100px; font-size: 100px;}
div { display: inline-block; }
.a { background: red ; height: 50px; width: 20px}
.b { background: cyan; height: 50px; width: 20px}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<section> <div class="a"></div><div class="b"></div></section>
</body>
</html>
答案1
得分: 1
这部分解释了在某些情况下（例如内容完全由内联元素组成时），计算行框高度会忽略行高：
链接：https://quirks.spec.whatwg.org/#the-blocks-ignore-line-height-quirk
引用自 whatwg.org：
3.4. 块级元素忽略行高特殊情况 在特殊模式和有限特殊模式下，对于内容由内联级别元素组成的块级容器元素，元素的行高必须在计算元素内行框的最小高度时被忽略。
英文:
This section explains that the calculation of the line box's height ignores line-height in certain cases (such as when the content is composed of inline elements only):
https://quirks.spec.whatwg.org/#the-blocks-ignore-line-height-quirk
<hr>
Quote from whatwg.org:
> 3.4. The blocks ignore line-height quirk In quirks mode and limited-quirks mode, for a block container element whose content is
> composed of inline-level elements, the element’s line-height must be
> ignored for the purpose of calculating the minimal height of line
> boxes within the element.
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论