两个列表/集合的并集大小的最快方法?编码效率

huangapple go评论82阅读模式
英文:

Fastest way to find the size of the union of two lists/sets? Coding Efficiency

问题

我正在研究Reddit上不同社区之间的关系。作为我的数据研究的一部分,我有大约49,000个CSV文件,用于我抓取的不同子社区的帖子。在我能够获取的所有帖子中,我获得了每个评论者以及他们的总声望和评论数量(请参见图片格式)。每个CSV文件包含我为该个别子社区收集的所有评论者。

我想要拿每个子社区与另一个子社区进行比较,并确定它们有多少共同的用户。我不需要用户列表,只需要它们的共同数量。我还想要为代码设置一个声望阈值,目前它设置为超过30声望。

对于我已经有的代码,我准备了两个用户列表,这些用户的声望超过阈值,然后我将这两个列表转换为集合,然后使用"&"运算符合并它们。以下是我的代码:

由于我一遍又一遍地重新读取相同的CSV文件以进行比较,我能否对它们进行预处理以使其更加高效?是否应该按字母顺序对用户名进行排序?我打算重新处理所有的CSV文件,以去除先前的“删除用户”,它们都是机器人,我应该按声望而不是按用户进行排序,这样不是比较声望是否高于一定水平,而是只读取到某个点?内存使用不是问题,只关心速度。我需要进行数十亿次的比较,所以任何时间的减少都会受到欢迎。

remove_list = dt.fread('D:/Spring 2023/red/c7/removal_users.csv')
drops = remove_list['C0'].to_list()[0]
def get_scores(current):
    sub = dt.fread(current)
    sub = pd.read_csv(current, sep=',', header=None)
    current = get_name(current)
    sub.columns = ['user', 'score']
    sub = sub[~sub['user'].isin(drops)]
    sub = sub[sub['score'] > 30]
    names = list(sub['user'])
    return names
def get_name(current):
    current = current.split('/')[-1].split('.')[-2]
    return current
def common_users(list1, list2):
    return len(set(list1) & set(list2))
英文:

I am conducting research on the relationships between different communities on Reddit. As part of my data research I have about 49,000 CSV's for sub I scraped and of all the posts I could get I got each commentator and thier total karma and number of comments (see pic for format) Each CSV contains all the commentors I have collected for that individual sub.

I want to take each sub and then compare it to another sub and identify how many users they have in common. I dont need a list of what users they are just the amount the two have in common. I also want to set a karma threshold for the code I currently have it is set to more than 30 karma.

For the code I have I prepare two lists of users who are over the threshold then I convert both those lists to sets and then "&" them together. Here is my code:   

Since I am re-reading the same CSVs over and over again to compare to each other can I prepare them to make this more efficient, sort user names alphabetically? I plan on re-doing all the CSVs  to get rid of the "removal users" which are all bots beforehand, should I sort by karma instead of users so rather than comparing if karma is above a certain level it only reads up to a certain point?Memory usage is not a problem only speed. I have billions of comparisons to make so any reduction in time is appreciated.  

remove_list = dt.fread('D:/Spring 2023/red/c7/removal_users.csv')
drops = remove_list['C0'].to_list()[0]
def get_scores(current):
    sub = dt.fread(current)
    sub = pd.read_csv(current, sep=',', header =None)
    current = get_name(current)
    sub.columns = ['user','score']
    sub = sub[~sub['user'].isin(drops)]
    sub = sub[sub['score'] > 30]
    names =list(sub['user'])
    return names
def get_name(current):
    current = current.split('/')[-1].split('.')[-2]
    return current
def common_users(list1,list2):
    return len(set(list1) & set(list2))

答案1

得分: 1

你尝试使用len()函数吗?它用于查找列表的长度。len()接受一个序列或集合作为参数。

英文:

Have you tried using the len() function it is used to find the length of a list. len() accepts a sequence or a collection as an argument.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月29日 03:13:22
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76576093.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定