Swift Combine 和 iOS 版本限制?

huangapple go评论75阅读模式
英文:

Swift Combine and iOS version limitations?

问题

以下是翻译好的部分:

例如,AppTrackingTransparency 在 iOS 14+ 中存在,但一个应用支持 iOS 13+。

我使用了以下代码:

@available(iOS 14, *)
func requestATTPermissions() -> Future<ATTrackingManager.AuthorizationStatus, Never> {
    ...
}

if #available(iOS 14, *) {
    requestATTPermissions()
        .sink { [weak self] _ in
            self?.completion?()
        }
        .store(in: &combineSubscriptionCollector.subscriptions)
} else {
    completion?()
}

但是否可以将 if #available(iOS 14, *) { 移动到 Future/AnyPublisher 中,在 iOS 13 中工作方式类似于 Just(()),而在 iOS14+ 中请求 ATT?类似于以下方式:

Just(()).map {
    if #available(iOS 14, *) {
        return requestATTPermissions()
           .map { status in ... }
    } else {
        return Just(())
    }
}
.sink { [weak self] _ in
    self?.completion?()
}
.store(in: &combineSubscriptionCollector.subscriptions)
英文:

For example AppTrackingTransparency exists in iOS 14+ but an app supports iOS 13+.

I used the following code:

@available(iOS 14, *)
    func requestATTPermissions() -&gt;
    Future&lt;ATTrackingManager.AuthorizationStatus, Never&gt; {
    ...
}

if #available(iOS 14, *) {
            requestATTPermissions()
                .sink { [weak self] _ in
                    self?.completion?()
                }
                .store(in: &amp;combineSubscriptionCollector.subscriptions)
        } else {
            completion?()
        }

But is it possible to move if #available(iOS 14, *) { into Future/AnyPublisher which in iOS 13 works like Just(()) and in iOS14+ requests ATT? Somehow like this:

Just(()).map {
  if #available(iOS 14, *) {
    return requestATTPermissions()
       .map { status in ... }
  } else {
    return Just(())
  }
}
.sink { [weak self] _ in
    self?.completion?()
}
.store(in: &amp;combineSubscriptionCollector.subscriptions)

答案1

得分: 1

If I understand correctly, you just need to use flatMap instead of map:

Just(()).flatMap { _ in
    if #available(iOS 14, *) {
        return requestATTPermisions().map { status in
            // 这里不需要返回任何内容...
        }.eraseToAnyPublisher()
    } else {
        return Just(()).eraseToAnyPublisher()
    }
}
// .sink and .store...

Though I think this is easier to read and understand:

let publisher: AnyPublisher<(), Never>
if #available(iOS 14, *) {
    publisher = requestATTPermisions().map { status in
        // ...
    }.eraseToAnyPublisher()
} else {
    publisher = Just(()).eraseToAnyPublisher()
}
publisher.sink { ... }.store(in: ...)
英文:

If I understand correctly, you just need to use flatMap instead of map:

Just(()).flatMap { _ in
    if #available(iOS 14, *) {
        return requestATTPermisions().map { status in
            // do not return anything here...
        }.eraseToAnyPublisher()
    } else {
        return Just(()).eraseToAnyPublisher()
    }
}
// .sink and .store...

Though I think this is easier to read and understand:

let publisher: AnyPublisher&lt;(), Never&gt;
if #available(iOS 14, *) {
    publisher = requestATTPermisions().map { status in
        // ...
    }.eraseToAnyPublisher()
} else {
    publisher = Just(()).eraseToAnyPublisher()
}
publisher.sink { ... }.store(in: ...)

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月26日 16:33:18
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76554924.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定