英文:
Recent technical documentation for boost asio
问题
我正在寻找最新的Boost.Asio库的技术文档。
我已经浏览了官方Boost.Asio网站，但它没有提供深入的技术文档。我对深入了解内部实现很感兴趣。
具体来说，我想了解最新的功能、改进和使用指南。
是否可以提供链接或参考资料，涵盖Boost.Asio的内部实现和使用的最新文档来源或指南？
非常感谢任何见解、示例或代码片段。
英文:
I'm looking for up-to-date technical documentation for Boost.Asio library.
I've explored the official Boost.Asio website, but it doesn't provide in-depth technical documentation. I'm interested in delving deeper into the internal implementation.
Specifically, I'm interested in understanding the latest features, improvements, and usage guidelines.
Could someone please provide me with links or references to recent documentation sources or guides that cover the internal implementation and usage of Boost.Asio?
Any insights, examples, or code snippets would be greatly appreciated.
答案1
得分: 2
> @Nelfeal，这太棒了，谢谢！ – Peter 1小时前
就此而言，Think-Async文档与Boost文档完全相同，但think-async.com曾经有相关的博客文章。
我认为具有讽刺意味的是，博客文章在某种程度上有点减少，但Asio文档（在Boost中镜像）在最近的版本中已经显著增加，我开始认真考虑它们。
这与4或5年前形成鲜明对比，当时我认为Asio原理和机制的最佳文档在Beast中（例如，这篇文章曾是唯一的可理解文档，而最近的Asio文档包含了关于异步结果、完成令牌和组合以及具有非常丰富的内联解释的示例的各种概念性文档。
我认为C++ Alliance在促使这种更深入的文档趋势方面发挥了重要作用。
> 在这种背景下，我突然想起克莱门斯·莫根斯特恩（Klemens Morgenstern）与克里斯·科尔霍夫（Chris Kohlhoff）坐下来讨论YouTube视频中的基本概念，它们非常实际。 例如，请看这里 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icgnqFM-aY4
英文:
> @Nelfeal, this is great, thank you ! – Peter 1 hour ago
To wit, the Think-Async documentation is identical to the Boost documentation, but think-async.com used to have relevant blog posts.
I think ironically, the blog posts sort-of dried up a little, but the Asio docs (mirrored in Boost) have grown tremendously over recent releases, and I'm starting to consider them in-depth.
This is in stark contrast with, say, 4 or 5 years ago, when I felt the best documentation of Asio principles and mechanisms were found in Beast (e.g. this article used the be the only comprehensible documentation, whereas recent Asio documentation contains a wealth of different conceptual documentation of async result, completion token and composition as well as examples with very rich inline explanations.
I think the C++ Alliance has played a great role as catalyst to generate this trend to deeper documentation.
> In that context, I just remembered that Klemens Morgenstern sat down with Chris Kohlhoff to talk about basic concepts in YouTube videos, and they were exceptionally grounded. See here e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icgnqFM-aY4
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论