使用递归寻找迷宫遍历的最小成本(请找出下面提到的解决方案中的问题)

huangapple go评论111阅读模式
英文:

Min cost in maze traversal using recursion (please find the issue in below mention solution)

问题

请帮我找出我在这个解决方案中犯了什么错误,因为我的输出是错误的。提前致谢。

  1. 给定一个数字 n,表示行数。
  2. 给定一个数字 m,表示列数。
  3. 给定 n*m 个数字,表示 2D 数组 a 的元素,它表示一个迷宫。
  4. 你站在左上角的单元格,并需要移动到右下角的单元格。
  5. 你可以在一次动作中向右移动 1 个单元格(水平移动)或向下移动 1 个单元格(垂直移动)。
  6. 每个单元格都有一个值,必须支付该值才能进入该单元格(即使是左上角和右下角的单元格)。
  7. 你需要遍历矩阵并打印最少代价的路径。

// 调用递归函数 findMinCost 来减少行和列,并找到其中的最小代价
public static int findMinCost(int[][] maze, int row, int col) {
if(row == 0 && col == 0) {
return maze[row][col];
}
int cost = 0;

if(row >= 0 && col >= 0) {
cost += Integer.min(findMinCost(maze, row-1, col),findMinCost(maze, row, col-1))+maze[row][col];
}
return cost;
}

英文:

Please help me in finding that where I am doing the mistake in this solution as my output is coming wrong. thanks in advance.

  1. You are given a number n, representing the number of rows.
  2. You are given a number m, representing the number of columns.
  3. You are given n*m numbers, representing elements of 2d array a, which represents a maze.
  4. You are standing in top-left cell and are required to move to bottom-right cell.
  5. You are allowed to move 1 cell right (h move) or 1 cell down (v move) in 1 motion.
  6. Each cell has a value that will have to be paid to enter that cell (even for the top-left and bottom-
    right cell).
  7. You are required to traverse through the matrix and print the cost of path which is least costly.
// making the recursive call to findMinCost by reducing the row and column and finding the min cost out of that  
public static int findMinCost(int[][] maze, int row, int col) {
  if(row == 0 && col == 0) {
    return maze[row][col];
  }
   int cost = 0;
          	
  if(row >= 0 && col >=0) {
   cost += Integer.min(findMinCost(maze, row-1, col),findMinCost(maze, row, col- 
    1))+maze[row][col];
   }
     return cost;
}

答案1

得分: 0

主要问题是,当坐标中的一个或两个变为负数时(这一定会发生),您的函数返回0作为成本。这是不正确的,因为零可能是一个有趣的成本选择。在这种情况下,搜索会超出迷宫,这应该是不可能的:因此,在这种情况下返回一个极高的成本,而不是0。

修复方法很简单:在第二个if块中添加一个else块:

} else return Integer.MAX_VALUE;

现在它将适用于小型迷宫。(我假设您在调用函数时正确使用rowcol引用迷宫中右下角的单元格)

对于较大的迷宫,您将遇到时间问题,因为这个算法将一遍又一遍地重新访问相同的子路径。您可以通过使用记忆化来解决这个问题。

英文:

The main problem is that when one or both of the coordinates become negative (and this will happen), your function returns 0 as cost. This is not correct, as zero might be an interesting cost to go for. In this case a search is made outside the maze and that should be made impossible: so return an extreme high cost in that case, not 0.

The fix is simple: add an else block to your second if block:

} else return Integer.MAX_VALUE;

Now it will work for small mazes. (I assume you correctly call your function with row and col referencing the bottom-right cell in the maze)

For larger mazes you will run into a timing problem, since this algorithm will revisit the same sub-paths over and over again. You can solve this by using memoization.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月12日 10:32:33
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76453332.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定