在获取数据时,使用共享服务以避免重复的API调用是否是一种好的做法?

huangapple go评论70阅读模式
英文:

Is it a good practice to use shared services to avoid duplicate API calls for fetched data?

问题

我有一个场景,在一个组件(ValuationComponent)中从后端获取车辆详细信息。一旦数据被获取,我需要在另一个组件(OtherComponent)中使用相同的数据进行各种操作。

与其在OtherComponent中进行单独的API调用,我正在考虑使用共享服务来存储从ValuationComponent获取的数据,并在OtherComponent中检索它。这样,我可以避免重复的API调用,并确保在各个组件之间保持一致的数据。

这种方法是否被认为是一种良好的实践?是否有任何潜在的缺点或替代方案我应该考虑?

在我的情况下,我已成功通过API调用从后端获取了ValuationComponent中的车辆详细信息。获取的数据存储在组件内的一个局部变量中。

在OtherComponent中,我希望访问相同的车辆详细信息,而不进行额外的API调用。为了实现这一点,我考虑使用一个持有获取的数据的共享服务。这样,我可以在OtherComponent中简单地从共享服务中检索数据。

英文:

I have a scenario where I fetch vehicle details from the backend in one component (ValuationComponent). Once the data is fetched, I need to use the same data in another component (OtherComponent) for various operations.

Instead of making a separate API call in OtherComponent, I'm considering using a shared service to store the fetched data from ValuationComponent and retrieve it in OtherComponent. This way, I can avoid duplicate API calls and ensure consistent data across components.

Is this approach considered a good practice? Are there any potential drawbacks or alternative solutions I should consider?

In my scenario, I have successfully fetched vehicle details from the backend in the ValuationComponent using an API call. The fetched data is stored in a local variable within the component.

In the Other Component, I want to access the same vehicle details without making an additional API call. To achieve this, I'm considering using a shared service that holds the fetched data. This way, I can simply retrieve the data from the shared service in Other Component.

答案1

得分: 0

是的,这绝对是使用服务的有效情况。

更进一步,rxJs / observables使得它更容易,而无需使用像shareReply这样的操作符来自己缓存它。

通常情况下,当您有副作用或繁重的计算,不希望它在多个订阅者之间执行时,您会想要使用shareReplay。它还可能在您知道将会有迟到的订阅者需要访问先前发出的值的情况下有价值。在订阅时重新播放值的能力是区分share和shareReplay的特点。

英文:

Yes, that's absolutely a valid scenario for using a service.

To take it one step further, rxJs / observables make it even easier without needing to cache it yourself with operators like shareReply

> You generally want to use shareReplay when you have side-effects or taxing computations that you do not wish to be executed amongst multiple subscribers. It may also be valuable in situations where you know you will have late subscribers to a stream that need access to previously emitted values. This ability to replay values on subscription is what differentiates share and shareReplay.

答案2

得分: -2

使用共享服务在Angular应用程序中存储和检索数据是一种常见的方法,它在某些情况下可以是一个良好的做法。它有助于避免冗余的API调用,并确保组件之间的数据一致性。

然而,您需要记住一些考虑因素和潜在的缺点:

  1. 数据一致性:在使用共享服务时,您需要确保存储在服务中的数据保持一致并保持最新状态。如果用户与您的应用程序交互时后端数据发生更改,您需要适当地处理更新共享数据。

  2. 数据共享范围:确保考虑共享服务的范围。如果需要使数据仅在特定模块或组件层次结构内可访问,则应相应地限定共享服务的范围。如果数据需要在整个应用程序范围内全局共享,您可以在根模块中提供共享服务。

  3. 依赖管理:如果多个组件依赖于共享服务,重要的是考虑依赖关系以及对服务进行更改可能产生的影响。如果对共享服务的实现进行更改,请确保不会意外影响依赖于数据的其他组件。

  4. 数据同步:如果共享服务中的获取数据可能随时间变化,您可能需要实现机制来在后端数据更改时更新共享数据。这可能涉及使用Websockets、长轮询或定期轮询来保持数据同步。

考虑的替代解决方案:

  1. 状态管理库:您可以考虑使用状态管理库,如NgRx或Akita,而不是使用共享服务。这些库提供了一个集中存储来有效管理应用程序状态并处理组件之间的数据共享。

  2. 缓存机制:您可以在应用程序中引入一个缓存层,用于临时存储获取的数据。当组件需要数据时,首先检查缓存,如果数据可用,可以直接使用它。这种方法有助于减少API调用并提高性能。

  3. 组件通信:根据组件层次结构和数据流,您可以探索组件通信的选项,如输入/输出属性、事件发射器或RxJS的subjects/observables。这样,当需要时,ValuationComponent可以直接将获取的数据传递给OtherComponent。

最终,最佳方法取决于您的应用程序的具体要求和复杂性。评估权衡并选择一个在数据一致性、性能和可维护性之间提供良好平衡的解决方案。

英文:

Using a shared service to store and retrieve data between components is a common approach in Angular applications, and it can be a good practice in certain scenarios. It helps avoid redundant API calls and ensures consistent data across components.

However, there are a few considerations and potential drawbacks you should keep in mind:

  1. Data consistency: When using a shared service, you need to ensure that the data stored in the service remains consistent and up to date. If the data changes on the backend while the user is interacting with your application, you need to handle updating the shared data appropriately.

  2. Data sharing scope: Make sure to consider the scope of the shared service. If you need the data to be accessible only within a specific module or component hierarchy, you should scope the shared service accordingly. If the data needs to be shared globally across the entire application, you can provide the shared service in the root module.

  3. Dependency management: If multiple components depend on the shared service, it's important to consider the dependencies and potential impact of changes to the service. If you make changes to the shared service implementation, ensure that it doesn't inadvertently affect other components relying on the data.

  4. Data synchronization: If the fetched data in the shared service can change over time, you may need to implement mechanisms to update the shared data whenever it changes on the backend. This could involve using websockets, long polling, or periodic polling to keep the data synchronized.

Alternative solutions to consider:

  1. State management libraries: Instead of using a shared service, you
    could leverage state management libraries like NgRx or Akita. These
    libraries provide a centralized store for managing application state
    and can handle data sharing between components effectively.

  2. Caching mechanisms: You could introduce a caching layer in your
    application to store the fetched data temporarily. When a component
    needs the data, it first checks the cache, and if the data is
    available, it can use it directly. This approach can help reduce API
    calls and improve performance.

  3. Component communication: Depending on your component hierarchy and
    data flow, you could explore options for component communication,
    such as input/output properties, event emitters, or RxJS
    subjects/observables. This way, the ValuationComponent can directly
    pass the fetched data to the OtherComponent when necessary.

Ultimately, the best approach depends on the specific requirements and complexity of your application. Evaluate the trade-offs and choose a solution that provides a good balance between data consistency, performance, and maintainability.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月5日 22:46:37
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76407625.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定