是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

huangapple go评论59阅读模式
英文:

Is it possible to use the same domain for API Gateway and Static S3 bucket behind a Cloudfront distribution?

问题

我目前正在AWS中创建一个反馈应用程序。我已经将后端部署在Lambda中,它与API Gateway连接,前端部分由位于Cloudfront分发后面的静态S3存储桶提供服务。

我想在API Gateway上启用TLS 1.2,但似乎只能通过Cloudfront实现。我还想能够在与S3存储桶不同路径但相同域名下提供服务。目前,S3存储桶位于feedback.domain.com。我以前将自定义域名绑定到API Gateway的api.feedback.domain.com上,这在我通过Postman进行请求时有效。但是,当我通过S3存储桶页面上的JavaScript进行请求时,它从不起作用,我会收到CORS错误。如果这是更可行的解决方案,我愿意使用它,但我需要提出有关CORS的另一个问题。

我希望API Gateway位于feedback.domain.com/api,因为据我所知,使用与发出请求的页面相同的域名应该解决CORS问题。我尝试了以下设置,但无法使其正常工作。

当我浏览feedback.domain.com/api时,我看到了我在Cloudfront中设置的错误页面。我尝试创建了一个使Cloudfront分发缓存失效的操作,但这并没有改变任何事情。

我修改了设置,使S3存储桶的源路径为/web/*,但随后到处都会出现AccessDenied错误。

设置:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

非常感谢提供智慧建议的任何人:)

更新:

以下是我的API阶段的Cloudwatch日志。我访问feedback.domain.com/api时,会收到一个403错误,其中包含我在Cloudfront中定义的自定义错误页面,但在Cloudwatch中没有日志记录:

这是行为:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

API行为:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

当前的源设置:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

@Caldazar注意,您提到403意味着我正在访问API,但如果我访问无效的URL,如feedback.domain.com/IDoNotExist,我仍然会收到403错误。我认为这与S3有关?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

英文:

I'm currently creating a feedback app in AWS. I have the backend in Lambda which is connected to API Gateway and the frontend of it is served by a Static S3 bucket behind a Cloudfront distribution.

I would like to enable TLS 1.2 on the API Gateway, however, this only seems possible via Cloudfront. I also want to be able to serve it on the same domain name but a different path as the S3 bucket. Currently, the S3 bucket sits on feedback.domain.com. I did have a custom dodmain hooked up to the API Gateway on api.feedback.domain.com, which would work when I made requests to it via Postman. However, when I made requests via the JavaScript on the S3 bucket pages, it would never work and I'd get a CORS error. I am happy to use this if more viable but I would need to ask another question about CORS.

I would like to get the API Gateway to sit on feedback.domain.com/api, because as far as I know, using the same domain as the page making the request should overcome CORS. I've tried the below setup but cannot get this to work.
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

When I browse to feedback.domain.com/api, I get the error page I set up in Cloudfront. I've tried creating an invalidation so it has cleared the cache on the Cloudfront distribution, but this hasn't changed anything.

I modified the setup so the S3 bucket's origin path was /web/* however i then proceed to get AccessDenied errors everywhere
Setup:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

Thank you in advance to anyone that can offer their wise wisdom 是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

UPDATE:

Below are my Cloudwatch Logs for the API stage. I go to feedback.domain.com/api, get a 403 error with my custom error page defined in Cloudfront, but no log in Cloudwatch: 是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

Here are behaviours:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

API behaviour:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

Current origin setup:
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

A note to @Caldazar, You mention 403 means I'm hitting the API, however, if I go to a none-valid url, feedback.domain.com/IDoNotExist I still get a 403 error. I believe this is something to do with S3?
是否可以在Cloudfront分发后同时使用相同域名用于API Gateway和静态S3存储桶?

答案1

得分: 1

问题出在你的Origin path上。

实际上,Origin path的值是在将请求发送到源时将附加到请求的内容。例如,对https://example.com/api/test的请求将导致发送到https://example.com/api/*/api/test的请求。

对于API Gateway,你的Origin path应该是你的API阶段,例如/dev/prod...

你应该创建额外的behavior,其路径模式应为/api/*,并且Origin设置为你上面创建的API origin

由于你的路径中有/api/,这样的路径不会正确匹配到你在API Gateway中的路径。为了处理这个问题,你应该将一个CloudFront Function添加到上面创建的API behavior中,作为Viewer request的一部分。CloudFront Functions位于Edit behavior页面的底部。这个函数应该将/api更改为/。以下是我在这种情况下可行的代码:

function handler(event) {
    var request = event.request;
    var uri = request.uri;

    // Check whether the URI starts with "api"
    if (uri.startsWith('/api/')) {
        request.uri = uri.replace('/api/', '/');
    }

    return request;
}

基于新的详细信息进行编辑:

为了访问API,你不能进入/api。你的行为设置是仅当你的路径为/api/*时才转发到API Gateway,这意味着只有当你访问像feedback.domain.com/api/mymethod这样的URL时才会触发。

至于第二部分,如果文件不存在,S3将返回403代码,因为有可能文件实际上存在,但用户没有权限查看该文件。

英文:

The problem is in your Origin path.

The Origin path value is actually what will be appended to your request when it's sent to the origin. For example, a request to https://example.com/api/test would result in a request being sent to https://example.com/api/*/api/test

For API Gateway, your Origin path should be your API stage, for example /dev, /prod...

You should create additional behavior that would have Path pattern /api/* and Origin set to your API origin that you created above.

Since you would have /api/ in your path, this wouldn't be matched properly to the path you have in API Gateway. To deal with that, you should add a CloudFront Function to your API behavior created above as part of the Viewer request. CloudFront Functions are at the bottom of the Edit behavior page. This function should change /api to /. This is code that works for me for such situations:

function handler(event) {
    var request = event.request;
    var uri = request.uri;

    // Check whether the URI starts with "api"
    if (uri.startsWith('/api/')) {
        request.uri = uri.replace('/api/', '/');
    }

    return request;
}

Edit based on new details:

In order to hit the API, you cannot go to /api. You behaviour is set to forward to API Gateway only if your path is /api/* which means, only if you go to a URL like feedback.domain.com/api/mymethod.

As for the second part, S3 will return 403 code if a file does not exist, because there's a possibility that a file actually exists, but your user does not have permission to see the file.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年6月2日 03:19:08
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76385050.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定