Rust polars Series::series_equal方法会在不正确的情况下断言。

huangapple go评论65阅读模式
英文:

Rust polars Series::series_equal method asserts even if incorrect

问题

The series_eq method checks if the two Series are approximately equal within a certain tolerance, allowing for small differences due to floating-point precision. This is why the test passes when using transformed_s.series_equal(&expected_s) despite minor differences in the values.

However, when you use the assert_eq! macro directly, it performs a strict equality check and considers even tiny differences as failures. That's why the test fails in that case, as there are slight differences in the floating-point values.

The series_eq method is useful when comparing floating-point values with some tolerance for small variations, making it more suitable for your scenario.

英文:

My test asserts true, even though I have different values in the Series.

In the below test index 0 (100.94947) is wrong but it passes

pub fn convert_tb_to_tib(s: Series) -> Series {
    let result = s.cast(&DataType::Float64).unwrap() * 0.90949470177293;
    result
}


    fn test_convert_tb_to_tib() {
        let test_s = Series::new("", &[100, 200, 300, 400]);
        let transformed_s = convert_tb_to_tib(test_s);
        let expected_s = Series::new("", &[100.94947, 181.89894, 272.848411, 373.797881]);
        transformed_s.series_equal(&expected_s);
    }

test wrangle::tests::test_convert_tb_to_tib ... ok

I can evidence this by using the assert_eq! macro instead:

    fn test_convert_tb_to_tib() {
        let test_s = Series::new("", &[100, 200, 300, 400]);
        let transformed_s = convert_tb_to_tib(test_s);
        let expected_s = Series::new("", &[100.94947, 181.89894, 272.848411, 373.797881]);
        assert_eq!(transformed_s, expected_s);
    }

thread 'wrangle::tests::test_convert_tb_to_tib' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
  left: `shape: (4,)
Series: '' [f64]
[
        90.94947
        181.89894
        272.848411
        363.797881
]`,
 right: `shape: (4,)
Series: '' [f64]
[
        100.94947
        181.89894
        272.848411
        373.797881
]`', src/wrangle.rs:108:9

Why does this test pass when using the series_eq method?

答案1

得分: 1

series_equal() 不会断言任何内容,它只进行比较并返回一个布尔值。

您需要使用 assert!() 来断言其结果:

assert!(transformed_s.series_equal(&expected_s));

但我建议您只使用 assert_eq!()

英文:

series_equal() doesn't assert anything, it only compares and returns a boolean.

You need to assert!() its result:

assert!(transformed_s.series_equal(&expected_s));

But I recommend you to just use assert_eq!().

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年5月14日 17:35:01
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/76246765.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定