vulkan: SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE 尽管在操作之间有完整的管线屏障

huangapple go评论47阅读模式
英文:

vulkan: SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE despite full pipeline barrier between operations

问题

我正在尝试在我的Vulkan应用程序中使用VK_LAYER_KHRONOS_validation的同步验证,但似乎无法使它“满意”。

在调试过程中,我已将问题简化为vkCmdDispatch -> 全流水线屏障 -> vkCmdCopyBuffer,根据我的理解,这不应导致原子风险。

以下是相关API转储的一部分:

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdBindPipeline(commandBuffer, pipelineBindPoint, pipeline) 返回 void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pipelineBindPoint: VkPipelineBindPoint = VK_PIPELINE_BIND_POINT_COMPUTE (1)
    pipeline:             VkPipeline = 0x5651fff4e5e0

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdPushDescriptorSetKHR(commandBuffer, pipelineBindPoint, layout, set, descriptorWriteCount, pDescriptorWrites) 返回 void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pipelineBindPoint: VkPipelineBindPoint = VK_PIPELINE_BIND_POINT_COMPUTE (1)
    layout:         VkPipelineLayout = 0x5651fff4e270
    set:                    uint32_t = 0
    descriptorWriteCount:   uint32_t = 1
    pDescriptorWrites: const VkWriteDescriptorSet* = 0x7ffe711a6130
        pDescriptorWrites[0]: const VkWriteDescriptorSet = 0x7ffe711a6130:
            sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_WRITE_DESCRIPTOR_SET (35)
            pNext:               const void* = NULL
            dstSet:          VkDescriptorSet = 0
            dstBinding:             uint32_t = 0
            dstArrayElement:        uint32_t = 0
            descriptorCount:        uint32_t = 1
            descriptorType: VkDescriptorType = VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER (7)
            pImageInfo: const VkDescriptorImageInfo* = UNUSED
            pBufferInfo: const VkDescriptorBufferInfo* = 0x5651fea830b0
                pBufferInfo[0]: const VkDescriptorBufferInfo = 0x5651fea830b0:
                    buffer:                 VkBuffer = 0x5651ffcbf560
                    offset:             VkDeviceSize = 0
                    range:              VkDeviceSize = 1048576
            pTexelBufferView: const VkBufferView* = UNUSED

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdDispatch(commandBuffer, groupCountX, groupCountY, groupCountZ) 返回 void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    groupCountX:            uint32_t = 1024
    groupCountY:            uint32_t = 1
    groupCountZ:            uint32_t = 1

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdPipelineBarrier2(commandBuffer, pDependencyInfo) 返回 void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pDependencyInfo: const VkDependencyInfo* = 0x7ffe711a6280:
        sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_DEPENDENCY_INFO (1000314003)
        pNext:               const void* = NULL
        dependencyFlags: VkDependencyFlags = 0
        memoryBarrierCount:     uint32_t = 1
        pMemoryBarriers: const VkMemoryBarrier2* = 0x7ffe711a6130
            pMemoryBarriers[0]: const VkMemoryBarrier2 = 0x7ffe711a6130:
                sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_MEMORY_BARRIER_2 (1000314000)
                pNext:               const void* = NULL
                srcStageMask: VkPipelineStageFlags2 = 65536 (VK_PIPELINE_STAGE_2_ALL_COMMANDS_BIT)
                srcAccessMask:    VkAccessFlags2 = 98304 (VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_READ_BIT | VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_WRITE_BIT)
                dstStageMask: VkPipelineStageFlags2 = 65536 (VK_PIPELINE_STAGE_2_ALL_COMMANDS_BIT)
                dstAccessMask:    VkAccessFlags2 = 98304 (VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_READ_BIT | VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_WRITE_BIT)
        bufferMemoryBarrierCount: uint32_t = 0
        pBufferMemoryBarriers: const VkBufferMemoryBarrier2* = NULL
        imageMemoryBarrierCount: uint32_t = 0
        pImageMemoryBarriers: const VkImageMemoryBarrier2* = NULL

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdCopyBuffer(commandBuffer, srcBuffer, dstBuffer, regionCount, pRegions) 返回 void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    srcBuffer:              VkBuffer = 0x5651ffcbf560
    dstBuffer:              VkBuffer = 0x5651fe986280
    regionCount:            uint32_t = 1
    pRegions:    const VkBufferCopy* = 0x7ffe711a6090
        pRegions[0]:  const VkBufferCopy = 0x7ffe711a6090:
            srcOffset:          VkDeviceSize = 0
            dstOffset:          VkDeviceSize = 0
            size:               VkDeviceSize = 1048576

供参考,我已上传完整的API转储此处

同步验证报告如下。

SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE(错误/规范):msgNum:-455515022 - 验证错误:[SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE] 对象0:句柄=0x55eebfc30cb0,类型=VK_OBJECT_TYPE_BUFFER;| MessageID=0xe4d96472 | vkCmdCopyBuffer:Hazard READ_AFTER_WRITE for srcBuffer VkBuffer 0x55eebfc30cb0[],region 0。 访问信息(用法:SYNC_COPY_TRANSFER_READ,prior_usage:SYNC_COMPUTE_SHADER_SHADER_STORAGE_WRITE,write_barriers:0,command:vkCmdDispatch,seq_no:1,reset_no:1)。

然而,根据我的理解,vkCmdDispatch和缓冲复制之间的全流水线屏障(按命令顺序)应该避免它们之间的重叠,也应考虑内存可见性。

值得注意的是,除了“最佳实践”之外,其他验证区域都没有报

英文:

I'm trying to use the synchronization validation of VK_LAYER_KHRONOS_validation in my vulkan application, but appear to be unable to "make it happy".
In the debugging process I've reduced the problem down to the a vkCmdDispatch -> full pipeline barrier -> vkCmdCopyBuffer which (according to my understanding) should not result in a RaW-hazard.

An excerpt of the relevant part of the API dump is show below:

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdBindPipeline(commandBuffer, pipelineBindPoint, pipeline) returns void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pipelineBindPoint: VkPipelineBindPoint = VK_PIPELINE_BIND_POINT_COMPUTE (1)
    pipeline:             VkPipeline = 0x5651fff4e5e0

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdPushDescriptorSetKHR(commandBuffer, pipelineBindPoint, layout, set, descriptorWriteCount, pDescriptorWrites) returns void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pipelineBindPoint: VkPipelineBindPoint = VK_PIPELINE_BIND_POINT_COMPUTE (1)
    layout:         VkPipelineLayout = 0x5651fff4e270
    set:                    uint32_t = 0
    descriptorWriteCount:   uint32_t = 1
    pDescriptorWrites: const VkWriteDescriptorSet* = 0x7ffe711a6130
        pDescriptorWrites[0]: const VkWriteDescriptorSet = 0x7ffe711a6130:
            sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_WRITE_DESCRIPTOR_SET (35)
            pNext:               const void* = NULL
            dstSet:          VkDescriptorSet = 0
            dstBinding:             uint32_t = 0
            dstArrayElement:        uint32_t = 0
            descriptorCount:        uint32_t = 1
            descriptorType: VkDescriptorType = VK_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_STORAGE_BUFFER (7)
            pImageInfo: const VkDescriptorImageInfo* = UNUSED
            pBufferInfo: const VkDescriptorBufferInfo* = 0x5651fea830b0
                pBufferInfo[0]: const VkDescriptorBufferInfo = 0x5651fea830b0:
                    buffer:                 VkBuffer = 0x5651ffcbf560
                    offset:             VkDeviceSize = 0
                    range:              VkDeviceSize = 1048576
            pTexelBufferView: const VkBufferView* = UNUSED

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdDispatch(commandBuffer, groupCountX, groupCountY, groupCountZ) returns void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    groupCountX:            uint32_t = 1024
    groupCountY:            uint32_t = 1
    groupCountZ:            uint32_t = 1

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdPipelineBarrier2(commandBuffer, pDependencyInfo) returns void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    pDependencyInfo: const VkDependencyInfo* = 0x7ffe711a6280:
        sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_DEPENDENCY_INFO (1000314003)
        pNext:               const void* = NULL
        dependencyFlags: VkDependencyFlags = 0
        memoryBarrierCount:     uint32_t = 1
        pMemoryBarriers: const VkMemoryBarrier2* = 0x7ffe711a6130
            pMemoryBarriers[0]: const VkMemoryBarrier2 = 0x7ffe711a6130:
                sType:           VkStructureType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_MEMORY_BARRIER_2 (1000314000)
                pNext:               const void* = NULL
                srcStageMask: VkPipelineStageFlags2 = 65536 (VK_PIPELINE_STAGE_2_ALL_COMMANDS_BIT)
                srcAccessMask:    VkAccessFlags2 = 98304 (VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_READ_BIT | VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_WRITE_BIT)
                dstStageMask: VkPipelineStageFlags2 = 65536 (VK_PIPELINE_STAGE_2_ALL_COMMANDS_BIT)
                dstAccessMask:    VkAccessFlags2 = 98304 (VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_READ_BIT | VK_ACCESS_2_MEMORY_WRITE_BIT)
        bufferMemoryBarrierCount: uint32_t = 0
        pBufferMemoryBarriers: const VkBufferMemoryBarrier2* = NULL
        imageMemoryBarrierCount: uint32_t = 0
        pImageMemoryBarriers: const VkImageMemoryBarrier2* = NULL

Thread 0, Frame 0:
vkCmdCopyBuffer(commandBuffer, srcBuffer, dstBuffer, regionCount, pRegions) returns void:
    commandBuffer:   VkCommandBuffer = 0x5651fe89b9f0
    srcBuffer:              VkBuffer = 0x5651ffcbf560
    dstBuffer:              VkBuffer = 0x5651fe986280
    regionCount:            uint32_t = 1
    pRegions:    const VkBufferCopy* = 0x7ffe711a6090
        pRegions[0]:  const VkBufferCopy = 0x7ffe711a6090:
            srcOffset:          VkDeviceSize = 0
            dstOffset:          VkDeviceSize = 0
            size:               VkDeviceSize = 1048576

For reference, I've uploaded the full API dump here.

The synchronization validation reports the following.

SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE(ERROR / SPEC): msgNum: -455515022 - Validation Error: [ SYNC-HAZARD-READ-AFTER-WRITE ] Object 0: handle = 0x55eebfc30cb0, type = VK_OBJECT_TYPE_BUFFER; | MessageID = 0xe4d96472 | vkCmdCopyBuffer: Hazard READ_AFTER_WRITE for srcBuffer VkBuffer 0x55eebfc30cb0[], region 0. Access info (usage: SYNC_COPY_TRANSFER_READ, prior_usage: SYNC_COMPUTE_SHADER_SHADER_STORAGE_WRITE, write_barriers: 0, command: vkCmdDispatch, seq_no: 1, reset_no: 1).

However, according to my understanding, the full pipeline barrier between the dispatch and the buffer copy (in command order) should avoid overlap between them also in execution order and with respect to memory visibility.

Notably, other validation areas (apart from "best practices") do not report any problems.

I'm at a loss what the validation error is supposed to tell me. Either I've made a very dumb small mistake which I cannot find, my understanding of synchronization is wrong or there is a bug in the validator.

答案1

得分: 0

这似乎是验证层中的一个错误(存在于版本1.3.236中),已在最新版本(1.3.239)中修复。

英文:

It appears that this was a bug in the validation layers (present in version 1.3.236), that has been fixed in the latest release (1.3.239).

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年3月15日 17:52:59
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/75743040.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定