正则表达式不匹配 – Tcl 脚本

huangapple go评论55阅读模式
英文:

mismatch in the regular expression - Tcl script

问题

在这个文件中,我想使用正则表达式获取一些信息,但它给我一些错误的数据。

其中 $line 是:

  + ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE ( 22636 * ) ( 41810 89000 )

情境: 与 ROUTED 不同,有些行包括 FIXED, COVER, SHIELD

正则表达式和我编写的一些代码如下:

if {[string match {*ROUTED*|*FIXED*|*COVER*|*SHIELD*} $line]} {

set RE {(\s*\+\s*(ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD)[^(]+\(\s*)([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)\s*\(\s*([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)}
		
if {[regexp $RE $line -> match1 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy]} {
     	set match1 $match1
		set Vxx  $Vxx
        set Vxy  $Vxy
        set Vyx  $Vyx
        set Vyy  $Vyy
puts $match1
puts $Vxx
puts $Vxy
puts $Vyx
puts $Vyy
}
}

这里给出的输出是:

+ ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE (
ROUTED
22636
*
41810

而我的期望结果是:

  + ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE (
22636
*
41810
89000 

在我的代码中有什么问题,有人能帮我调试吗?

英文:

In the file i want to fetch some information using regular expressions, but it's giving me some wrong data.

where $line is:

  + ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE ( 22636 * ) ( 41810 89000 )

Pov: instead of ROUTED Some lines consist of FIXED, COVER, SHIELD

the regex and some code what i wrote

if {[string match {*ROUTED*|*FIXED*|*COVER*|*SHIELD*} $line]} {

set RE {(\s*\+\s*(ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD)[^(]+\(\s*)([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)\s*\(\s*([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)}
		
if {[regexp $RE $line -> match1 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy]} {
     	set match1 $match1
		set Vxx  $Vxx
        set Vxy  $Vxy
        set Vyx  $Vyx
        set Vyy  $Vyy
puts $match1
puts $Vxx
puts $Vxy
puts $Vyx
puts $Vyy
}
}

where this giving me output as

+ ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE (
ROUTED
22636
*
41810

where my expected result is

  + ROUTED M12 10000 + SHAPE STRIPE (
22636
*
41810
89000 

what's the wrong in the code can anyone debug my code?

答案1

得分: 2

如果你要的只是代码部分的中文翻译,那么以下是代码的中文翻译:

如果你觉得你的正则表达式难以阅读和维护可以尝试这个不依赖正则表达式只依赖列表位置的替代方法只要你解析的每一行都满足 Tcl 正确列表的要求

if {[lindex $line 1] in {ROUTED FIXED COVER SHIELD}} {
    if {[llength $line] == 15} {
        foreach i {8 9 12 13} {
            puts [lindex $line $i]
        }
    }
}

另一个替代方法是使用 `scan` 命令

scan $line "+ %s %s %s + %s %s ( %s %s ) ( %s %s )" status layer len type1 type2 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy
if {$status in {ROUTED FIXED COVER SHIELD}} {
    puts $Vxx
    puts $Vxy
    puts $Vyx
    puts $Vyy
}
英文:

I find your regex very difficult to read and maintain.

If each line you parse meets the requirements of a Tcl proper list, then try this alternative that doesn't rely regular expressions, but only positions in a list.

if {[lindex $line 1] in {ROUTED FIXED COVER SHIELD}} {
    if {[llength $line] ==15} {
        foreach i {8 9 12 13} {
            puts [lindex $line $i]
        }
    }
}

--> 22636
    *
    41810
    89000

Another alternative is the scan command:

scan $line "+ %s %s %s + %s %s ( %s %s ) ( %s %s )" status layer len type1 type2 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy
if {$status in {ROUTED FIXED COVER SHIELD}} {
    puts $Vxx
    puts $Vxy
    puts $Vyx
    puts $Vyy
}

答案2

得分: 1

你想要(ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD)被匹配为一组备选项,但报告为子匹配。尝试使用(?:ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD) - 参见https://www.tcl-lang.org/man/tcl8.6/TclCmd/re_syntax.htm#M16

英文:

You want (ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD) to be matched as a group of alternatives but not reported as a sub-match. Try using (?:ROUTED|FIXED|COVER|SHIELD) - see https://www.tcl-lang.org/man/tcl8.6/TclCmd/re_syntax.htm#M16

答案3

得分: 0

if {[string match {ROUTED} $line] || [string match {FIXED} $line] || [string match {COVER} $line] || [string match {SHIELD} $line]} {
puts $line

set RE {(\s*\+\s*(FIXED|ROUTED)[^(]+\(\s*)([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)\s*\(\s*([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)}

if {[regexp $RE $line -> match1 match2 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy]} {

<details>
<summary>英文:</summary>

if {[string match {*ROUTED*} $line] || [string match {*FIXED*} $line] || [string match {*COVER*} $line] || [string match {*SHIELD*} $line]} {
	puts $line

	set RE {(\s*\+\s*(FIXED|ROUTED)[^(]+\(\s*)([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)\s*\(\s*([^\s()]+)\s+([^\s()]+)\s*\)}


    	if {[regexp $RE $line -&gt; match1 match2 Vxx Vxy Vyx Vyy]} {
the regular expression is correct but there is a change in if condition and it will work as per my requirement.
thanks for the effort.

</details>



huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2023年2月24日 00:09:57
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/75547398.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定