英文:
Is it advisable to run Couchbase with 'EFS Elastic Throughput' instead of EBS?
问题
根据'Couchbase on AWS'的最佳实践建议，在AWS云平台中运行Couchbase时，建议根据以下链接使用EBS 'gp3'或EBS 'io1'。（https://docs.couchbase.com/server/current/cloud/couchbase-cloud-deployment.html#aws-deployment-methods）
但是AWS似乎推出了一种新的EFS存储类型，称为“Amazon EFS Elastic Throughput”（https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-announcing-amazon-efs-elastic-throughput/）。它提供了更好的吞吐量。是否建议在Couchbase存储中使用具有弹性吞吐量的EFS？
AWS声称的吞吐量：弹性吞吐量允许您将吞吐量提高到每个文件系统的读操作上限为3 GiB/s，写操作上限为1 GiB/s，适用于所有地区。
英文:
We run Couchbase in Kubernetes platform in AWS cloud. As per the 'Couchbase on AWS' best practices, it is suggested to use EBS 'gp3' or EBS 'io1' based on the following link. (https://docs.couchbase.com/server/current/cloud/couchbase-cloud-deployment.html#aws-deployment-methods)
But it seems AWS has introduced a new EFS storage type, known as, "Amazon EFS Elastic Throughput" (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-announcing-amazon-efs-elastic-throughput/). It gives much better throughput. Is it suggested to use EFS with Elastic Throughput for Couchbase storage?
Throughput claimed by AWS: Elastic Throughput allows you to drive throughput up to a limit of 3 GiB/s for read operations and 1 GiB/s for write operations per file system in all Regions.
答案1
得分: 1
抱歉这里耽搁了。简而言之，我们不建议将EFS与Couchbase一起使用，因为它是一个文件共享而不是块设备。
英文:
Apologies for the delay here. In short, no we do not recommend using EFS with Couchbase as it is a file share rather than a block device.
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论