更新操作忽略了限制子句。

huangapple go评论73阅读模式
英文:

Update is ignoring the Limit clause

问题

Gorm似乎不支持在Update中使用Limit,并且也不会抛出错误。

这个查询将更新数据库中所有字段的状态,从VoucherStatusAvailable更新为VoucherStatusBooked,而不考虑Limit的使用。

有人在这里快速解决了这个问题:https://penkovski.com/post/gorm-update-returning/
但是他们将Limit放在Where子句中的解决方案:

resUpdate := tx.Model(&daos.Voucher{}).
			Where("status = ? LIMIT ?", models.VoucherStatusAvailable, quantity).
			Update("status", models.VoucherStatusBooked)

当使用gorm软删除时,这种方法不起作用,因为它在where子句周围放置了括号,并在其后添加了AND deleted_at = NULL过滤器。

最初我是用两个分开的查询(先查询再更新)来做的,但在这种情况下可能会出现冲突。
有人有什么主意,我应该如何选择表中的X个成员,然后更新它们的状态,而不会与所选项发生冲突吗?

编辑:我使用的DBMS是PostgreSQL。

英文:

Gorm doesn't seem to support the use of Limit with Update, and doesn't throw an error either.

resUpdate := tx.Model(&daos.Voucher{}).
			Where("status = ?", models.VoucherStatusAvailable).
			Limit(quantity).
                        Scan(&vouchers).
			Update("status", models.VoucherStatusBooked)

This query will update every field in my DB from VoucherStatusAvailable to VoucherStatusBooked, without regards for the use of Limit.

Someone quickly addressed the subject here : https://penkovski.com/post/gorm-update-returning/
But their solution of putting the Limit in the Where clause :

resUpdate := tx.Model(&daos.Voucher{}).
			Where("status = ? LIMIT ?", models.VoucherStatusAvailable, quantity).
			Update("status", models.VoucherStatusBooked)

doesn't work when using gorm soft delete, since it put parentheses around the where clause, and the AND deleted_at = NULL filter after it.

Initially I was doing it with two separated query (a select then an update) but in this case there is a chance of conflict.
Does anyone have an idea of how I should do the selection of X members of the table, then update their status, without having a risk of conflict with the selected items ?

Edit : The DBMS I'm using is PostgreSQL

答案1

得分: 0

不同的问题得到了回答:

  1. Postgre不支持LIMIT和ORDER BY,所以我需要一个替代方案。
  2. 正确的替代方案似乎是CTEs,正如评论中指出的那样。
  3. gorm支持自定义插件,有一个插件实现了CTE:https://github.com/WinterYukky/gorm-extra-clause-plugin。不幸的是,它与Update子句不兼容。
  4. 因此,我找到的唯一解决方案是在原始SQL中使用CTE:
        var updated []Voucher
		resUpdate := tx.Raw(`WITH v AS (
			SELECT * from vouchers WHERE status = ?
			LIMIT ?
		)
		UPDATE vouchers SET status = ?
		WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM v WHERE vouchers.id = v.id)
		RETURNING *`,
        models.ArticleStatusAvailable, quantity, models.VoucherStatusBooked).
        Scan(&updated)
英文:

Different point were answered :

  1. Postgre doesn't support LIMIT and ORDER BY, so I needed an alternative.
  2. The right alternative seemed to be CTEs, as pointed out in a comment.
  3. gorm support custom plugin, and there is a plugin that implement CTE : https://github.com/WinterYukky/gorm-extra-clause-plugin. Unfortunately, it isn't compatible with the Update clause.
  4. So ultimately, the only solution I found is to do a CTE in raw SQL :
        var updated []Voucher
		resUpdate := tx.Raw(`WITH v AS (
			SELECT * from vouchers WHERE status = ?
			LIMIT ?
		)
		UPDATE vouchers SET status = ?
		WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM v WHERE vouchers.id = v.id)
		RETURNING *`,
        models.ArticleStatusAvailable, quantity, models.VoucherStatusBooked).
        Scan(&updated)

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2022年11月7日 22:39:20
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/74348334.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定