如何返回嵌套地图中键的值

huangapple
go评论104阅读模式
英文:

How to return value of a key in nested map

问题

我想编写一个通用函数func GetVal(map[interface{}]interface{}, key interface{}) interface{}。它将接受一个map和一个要搜索的键，并返回值或nil。

该map可以具有任何数据类型，并且可以嵌套到任意级别。例如，

  1. var s1 = "S1"
  2. var s2 = "S2"
  3. var s3 = s1 + "==" + s2 + "==S3"
  4. var s4 = s3 + "==S4"
  5. var nestedMap = map[interface{}]interface{}{
  6. 	"data": map[interface{}]interface{}{
  7. 		"TEST_KEY": "1234353453",
  8. 		"metadata": map[interface{}]interface{}{
  9. 			"created_time": "2022-08-06",
  10. 		},
  11. 		"custom_metadata": map[interface{}][]interface{}{
  12. 			"destroyed": []interface{}{
  13. 				&s1,
  14. 				map[string]interface{}{
  15. 					"auth": []interface{}{
  16. 						"val3", "val4", "val45",
  17. 					},
  18. 				},
  19. 			},
  20. 		},
  21. 		&s2: &[]*string{
  22. 			&s1, &s2,
  23. 		},
  24. 		&s1: &[]int{
  25. 			10, 20, 233,
  26. 		},
  27. 		123: &s3,
  28. 	},
  29. 	s3: []interface{}{
  30. 		[]interface{}{
  31. 			map[string]*string{
  32. 				s4: &s4,
  33. 			},
  34. 		},
  35. 	},
  36. }

期望的返回值
GetVal(nestedMap, "metadata")应返回{"created_time": "2022-08-06"}
GetVal(nestedMap, "destroyed")应返回

  1. {  &s1,
  2.    map[string]interface{}{
  3.       "auth": []interface{}{
  4. 	     "val3", "val4", "val45",
  5. 	  },
  6.    },
  7. }

有没有办法在不使用外部库的情况下实现这个功能？

这个问题看起来类似于在Golang中访问类型为map[string]interface{}的嵌套map，但在我的情况下，字段不是有限的或总是相同的。

英文:

I want to write a generic function func GetVal(map[interface{}]interface{}, key interface{}) interface{}. This will take a map and a key to search for and return either the value or nil.

The map can have any data type and can go to any level of nesting. For example,

  1. var s1 = "S1"
  2. var s2 = "S2"
  3. var s3 = s1 + "==" + s2 + "==S3"
  4. var s4 = s3 + "==S4"
  5. var nestedMap = map[interface{}]interface{}{
  6. 	"data": map[interface{}]interface{}{
  7. 		"TEST_KEY": "1234353453",
  8. 		"metadata": map[interface{}]interface{}{
  9. 			"created_time": "2022-08-06",
  10. 		},
  11. 		"custom_metadata": map[interface{}][]interface{}{
  12. 			"destroyed": []interface{}{
  13. 				&s1,
  14. 				map[string]interface{}{
  15. 					"auth": []interface{}{
  16. 						"val3", "val4", "val45",
  17. 					},
  18. 				},
  19. 			},
  20. 		},
  21. 		&s2: &[]*string{
  22. 			&s1, &s2,
  23. 		},
  24. 		&s1: &[]int{
  25. 			10, 20, 233,
  26. 		},
  27. 		123: &s3,
  28. 	},
  29. 	s3: []interface{}{
  30. 		[]interface{}{
  31. 			map[string]*string{
  32. 				s4: &s4,
  33. 			},
  34. 		},
  35. 	},
  36. }

Expected return values
GetVal(nestedMap, "metadata") should return {"created_time": "2022-08-06"}
GetVal(nestedMap, "destroyed") should return

  1. {  &s1,
  2.    map[string]interface{}{
  3.       "auth": []interface{}{
  4. 	     "val3", "val4", "val45",
  5. 	  },
  6.    },
  7. }

Is there a way to do it without an external library?

This question looks similar to
Accessing Nested Map of Type map[string]interface{} in Golang but in my case the fields are not limited or always same

答案1

得分: 2

问题有点晦涩，因为示例过于复杂。如果你想了解有关循环函数的知识，你应该从一些更简单的东西开始，比如：

  1. var nestedMap = map[string]interface{}{
  2. 	"k1": "v1",
  3. 	"k2": map[string]interface{}{
  4. 		"nestedK1": "nestedV1",
  5. 		"nestedK2": "nestedV2",
  6. 		"nestedK3": map[string]interface{}{
  7. 			"superNestedK1": "FOUND!!!",
  8. 		},
  9. 	},
  10. }

否则，解释会很困难。

然后你可以研究像这样的函数：

  1. func GetVal(data map[string]interface{}, key string) (result interface{}, found bool) {
  2. 	for k, v := range data {
  3. 		if k == key {
  4. 			return v, true
  5. 		} else {
  6. 			switch v.(type) {
  7. 			case map[string]interface{}:
  8. 				if result, found = GetVal(v.(map[string]interface{}), key); found {
  9. 					return
  10. 				}
  11. 			}
  12. 		}
  13. 	}
  14. 	return nil, false
  15. }

之后，你可以考虑添加对 map[interface{}][]interface{} 这样花哨的东西的支持。

然而，如果你真的需要这样复杂的结构，我不确定整个应用程序的设计是否合适。

也许你还应该考虑在地图中搜索完整路径 k2.nestedK3.superNestedK1。这将消除歧义。

英文:

The question is kind of cryptic because the example is overcomplicated. If you want to get knowledge regarding the recurrent functions, you should start with something simpler like:

  1. var nestedMap = map[string]any{
  2. "k1": "v1",
  3. "k2": map[string]any{
  4. 	"nestedK1": "nestedV1",
  5. 	"nestedK2": "nestedV2",
  6. 	"nestedK3": map[string]any{
  7. 		"superNestedK1" : "FOUND!!!",
  8. 	},
  9. },}

Otherwise, an explanation will be hard.

Then you can work on functions like:

  1. func GetVal(data map[string]any, key string) (result any, found bool) {
  2. for k, v := range data {
  3. 	if k == key {
  4. 		return v, true
  5. 	} else {
  6. 		switch v.(type) {
  7. 		case map[string]any:
  8. 			if result, found = GetVal(v.(map[string]any), key); found {
  9. 				return
  10. 			}
  11. 		}
  12. 	}
  13. }
  14. return nil, false}

Later you can think about adding support for fancy stuff like map[interface{}][]interface{}

However, if you really need such complicated structure, I am not sure if the whole design of application is ok.

Maybe you should also think about adding searching for a full path inside the map k2.nestedK3.superNestedK1. It will remove ambiguity.

答案2

得分: 0

// 支持通过路径获取值：例如 k2.nestedK3.superNestedK1
// 感谢Lukasz Szymik的答案，他的代码启发了我实现这个功能。
func GetValueByPathFromMap(data map[string]any, key string, passedKey string) (result any, found bool) {

  1. keyAndPath := strings.SplitN(key, ".", 2)
  2. currentKey := keyAndPath[0]
  3. if passedKey != "" {
  4. 	passedKey = passedKey + "." + currentKey
  5. } else {
  6. 	passedKey = currentKey
  7. }
  9. if _, isKeyExistInData := data[currentKey]; !isKeyExistInData {
  10. 	logrus.Warnf("[W] key path { %s } not found", passedKey)
  11. 	return
  12. } else {
  14. 	if len(keyAndPath) > 1 {
  15. 		remainingPath := keyAndPath[1]
  16. 		switch data[currentKey].(type) {
  17. 		case map[string]any:
  18. 			if result, found = GetValueByPathFromMap(data[currentKey].(map[string]any), remainingPath, passedKey); found {
  19. 				return
  20. 			}
  21. 		}
  22. 	} else {
  23. 		return data[currentKey], true
  24. 	}
  25.   }
  27. return nil, false

}

英文: 
  1. // Supports getting value by path: i.e. k2.nestedK3.superNestedK1
  2. // Thanks Lukasz Szymik for his answer, which inspired me to implement this functionality based on his code.
  3. func GetValueByPathFromMap(data map[string]any, key string, passedKey string) (result any, found bool) {
  5. keyAndPath := strings.SplitN(key, ".", 2)
  6. currentKey := keyAndPath[0]
  7. if passedKey != "" {
  8. 	passedKey = passedKey + "." + currentKey
  9. } else {
  10. 	passedKey = currentKey
  11. }
  13. if _, isKeyExistInData := data[currentKey]; !isKeyExistInData {
  14. 	logrus.Warnf("[W] key path { %s } not found", passedKey)
  15. 	return
  16. } else {
  18. 	if len(keyAndPath) > 1 {
  19. 		remainingPath := keyAndPath[1]
  20. 		switch data[currentKey].(type) {
  21. 		case map[string]any:
  22. 			if result, found = GetValueByPathFromMap(data[currentKey].(map[string]any), remainingPath, passedKey); found {
  23. 				return
  24. 			}
  25. 		}
  26. 	} else {
  27. 		return data[currentKey], true
  28. 	}
  29.   }
  31. return nil, false
  32. }

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2022年8月12日 19:46:59
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接：https://go.coder-hub.com/73333661.html
  • go
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定