英文:
Is there a simple method for square root of big.Rat?
问题
我需要找到一个大数的平方根。有没有一种方法可以在不丢失（已经存在的）精度的情况下进行计算？
例如，我可以将分子和分母转换为浮点数，获取平方根，然后再转换回来...
func ratSquareRoot(num *big.Rat) *big.Rat {f, exact := num.Float64() //Yuck! Floats!squareRoot := math.Sqrt(f)var accuracy int64 = 10 ^ 15 //float64的有效数字位数return big.NewRat(int64(squareRoot*float64(accuracy)), accuracy)// ^ 这样做完全没有意义。而且可能没有很好地简化。}
...但这样会消除使用有理数的所有精度。有没有更好的方法来做这个？
英文:
I need to find the square root of a big.Rat. Is there a way to do it without losing (already existing) accuracy?
For example, I could convert the numerator and denominator into floats, get the square root, and then convert it back...
func ratSquareRoot(num *big.Rat) *big.Rat {f, exact := num.Float64() //Yuck! Floats!squareRoot := math.Sqrt(f)var accuracy int64 = 10 ^ 15 //Significant digits of precision for float64return big.NewRat(int64(squareRoot*float64(accuracy)), accuracy)// ^ This is now totally worthless. And also probably not simplified very well.
}
...but that would eliminate all of the accuracy of using a rational. Is there a better way of doing this?
答案1
得分: 2
big.Float类型具有.Sqrt(x)操作，并且可以明确定义所需的精度。我建议尝试使用它，并使用你问题中的相同操作将结果转换回Rat，只需操作big.Int值。
r := big.NewRat(1, 3)var x big.Floatx.SetPrec(30) // 我没有正确理解'Prec'部分，比我更仔细地阅读文档并进行实验x.SetRat(r)var s big.Floats.SetPrec(15)s.Sqrt(&x)r, _ = s.Rat(nil)fmt.Println(x.String(), s.String())fmt.Println(r.String(), float64(18919)/float64(32768))
英文:
The big.Float type has a .Sqrt(x) operation, and handles defining explicitly the precision you aim for. I'd try to use that and convert the result back to a Rat with the same operations in your question, only manipulating big.Int values.
r := big.NewRat(1, 3)var x big.Floatx.SetPrec(30) // I didn't figure out the 'Prec' part correctly, read the docs more carefully than I did and experiementx.SetRat(r)var s big.Floats.SetPrec(15)s.Sqrt(&x)r, _ = s.Rat(nil)fmt.Println(x.String(), s.String())fmt.Println(r.String(), float64(18919)/float64(32768))
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论