英文:
Is it possible to omit FieldID in struct when using gorm?
问题
看一个他们文档中的例子：
type User struct {gorm.ModelName stringCompanyID intCompany Company}type Company struct {ID intName string}
CompanyID 字段似乎有些多余。是否可以使用 Company 字段上的一些标签来摆脱它？
英文:
Looking at an example from their documentation:
type User struct {gorm.ModelName stringCompanyID intCompany Company}type Company struct {ID intName string}
CompanyID field seems rather redundant. Is it possible to get rid of it using some tags on Company field instead?
答案1
得分: 1
将User的定义更改为以下内容即可解决问题：
type User struct {gorm.ModelName stringCompany Company `gorm:"column:company_id"`}
英文:
Changing User definition like this did the trick:
type User struct {gorm.ModelName stringCompany Company `gorm:"column:company_id"`}
答案2
得分: 0
你可以创建自己的BaseModel，而不是使用gorm.Model，例如：
type BaseModel struct {ID uint `gorm:"not null;AUTO_INCREMENT;primary_key;"`CreatedAt *time.TimeUpdatedAt *time.TimeDeletedAt *time.Time `sql:"index"`}
然后，在User结构体中，可以像这样做，基本上是覆盖默认的Foreign Key：
type User struct {BaseModelName stringCompany company `gorm:"foreignKey:id"`}
还有Company结构体：
type Company struct {BaseModelName string}
英文:
You can create your own BaseModel instead of using gorm.Model, for example
type BaseModel struct {ID uint `gorm:"not null;AUTO_INCREMENT;primary_key;"`CreatedAt *time.TimeUpdatedAt *time.TimeDeletedAt *time.Time `sql:"index"`}
Then, in the User, do something like this, basically overriding the default Foreign Key
type User struct {BaseModelName stringCompany company `gorm:"foreignKey:id"`}
And the Company
type Company struct {BaseModelName string}
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库，让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论