`app.errorLog.Output`的错误返回值未被检查。

huangapple go评论74阅读模式
英文:

Error return value of `app.errorLog.Output` is not checked

问题

我对golang还不太熟悉,对不起,我有一个问题。
我有以下函数:

func (app *application) serverError(w http.ResponseWriter, err error) {
  trace := fmt.Sprintf("%s\n%s", err.Error(), debug.Stack())
  app.errorLog.Output(2, trace)

  http.Error(w, http.StatusText(http.StatusInternalServerError), http.StatusInternalServerError)
}

我正在使用golangci-lint linter,当我启动linter时,它返回以下错误:

cmd/web/helpers.go:15:22: `app.errorLog.Output` 的错误返回值未被检查 (errcheck)
  app.errorLog.Output(2, trace)
                     ^

我该如何修复这个问题?

英文:

I'm pretty new to golang so sorry for my question.
I have the following function:

func (app *application) serverError(w http.ResponseWriter, err error) {
  trace := fmt.Sprintf("%s\n%s", err.Error(), debug.Stack())
  app.errorLog.Output(2, trace)

  http.Error(w, http.StatusText(http.StatusInternalServerError), http.StatusInternalServerError)
}

I'm using golangci-lint linter, and when I launch the linter, it returns the following error:

cmd/web/helpers.go:15:22: Error return value of `app.errorLog.Output` is not checked (errcheck)
  app.errorLog.Output(2, trace)
                     ^

How can I fix that?

答案1

得分: 1

在Go语言中,一种常见的模式是定义一个函数,该函数返回两个值,第一个是期望的结果,第二个是error类型。

通常情况下,如果由于某些错误e而无法提供一个值,函数会返回nil, e<类型的零值>, e

然而,并不一定只有一个期望的结果值,有时可能会有零个或多个期望的结果值。基本规则是:如果函数的最后一个返回值是error类型,并且文档没有其他说明,那么在继续之前,始终要检查该返回值。

因此,当你在返回签名中看到这种模式时,不应该使用忽略返回或将其赋值给_来丢弃最后一个结果,而应该检查该值,确保它不为nil后再继续执行。

第一个反模式是linter(代码检查工具)正在警告你的内容。你可以这样检查错误参数(我假设这里没有任何“期望的结果”值):

if err := app.errorLog.Output(2, trace); err != nil {
    // ... 在这里处理错误或者 panic(err)
}

这样可以满足linter的要求,并使你的代码更加健壮!

英文:

In go, a common pattern is to have a function that returns two values, the first of which is the desired result, and the second of which is type error.

Typically, if an implementation cannot provide a value because of some error e, it will return nil, e or return &lt;zero value for type&gt;, e.

It doesn't just have to be one such desired result value, however - sometimes there will be zero or more than one desired result values. Basic rule: if the last return value of a function is error typed, and the docs don't say otherwise, always check that last return value.

So, when you see such a pattern in a return signature - you should not discard the last result with a ignored return or an assign to '_', but should check that value to make sure it is non-nil before continuing.

The first of those anti-patterns is what the linter is warning you about. You can check the error argument thusly (I'm assuming that there are zero "desired result" values here):

 if err := app.errorLog.Output(2, trace); err != nil {
     // ... do something to handle error here or panic(err)
 }

This will satisfy the linter and make your code more robust!

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2021年6月22日 03:53:20
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/68073946.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定