构建多个二进制版本,每个版本针对不同的共享库进行编译。

huangapple go评论132阅读模式
英文:

go build multiple binary versions each against a different shared library

问题

我想创建一个能够通过其本地接口与xen通信的go可执行文件。为此,有一个C共享库(实际上有两个),我使用cgo创建了一个简单的go包装器。

问题是我想要针对3个xen版本(3.2、3.4、4.0)进行目标设置,每个版本都有一个不同的共享库。这个库本身基本上提供了相同的API,但在C头文件中定义的结构体的大小和形状是不同的,因此同一个编译后的go二进制文件不能与这些不同的共享库一起使用。

我想要一个包含“main”函数的go二进制文件和一个用于xen的go包装器。

我考虑了两种解决方案:

  1. 我可以构建3个不同版本的编译后的包以及3个不同版本的主二进制文件,每个都链接到相应的包版本。这个解决方案需要手动构建makefile,以便我可以传递正确的路径等。

  2. 我可以构建一个薄的C包装器作为共享库,并针对3个xen C绑定的版本构建它的3个版本。然后,这个C包装器将导出一个稳定的C接口,由一个单独的go包使用。然后,我可以将正确的C包装器共享库部署到主机上,并在运行时解析它。

还有其他处理这个问题的方法吗?我更喜欢使用纯(c)go代码,但我不喜欢维护复杂的makefile所带来的额外负担。

编辑:关于为什么我对在makefile中手动处理这个问题感到不舒服的更多细节:

例如,_obj目录的名称在Make.inc和company中是硬编码的,而这些makefile依赖于一些包含有关共享库名称的特殊信息的生成的.c文件,在构建下一个版本的包之前,我必须清理它们。我的makefile片段如下:

all:
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=3.0
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=3.4
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=4.0

其中Makefile.common基本上是一个普通的包makefile,它使用TARG=$(XENVERSION)/vimini/xen,因为我不能在包名中编码版本,否则我将不得不修改源文件中的导入。

通过在包目录中编码版本,我可以使用GCIMPORTS=-I../../pkg/xen/_obj/$(XENVERSION)来选择正确的一个。

当然,我可以编写自己的makefile,调用6c和6l、cgo等,但我更喜欢利用现有的make基础设施,因为它似乎有一些智慧。

英文:

I want to create a go executable which communicates with xen through it's native interface. There is a C shared library (actually 2) for this purpose and I created a simple go wrapper with cgo.

The problem is that I want to target 3 xen versions (3.2, 3.4, 4.0), each of which has a different shared library. The library itself provides basically the same API, but the sizes and shape of the structs defined in the C header are different, and thus the same compiled go binary cannot be used with these different shared libraries.

I want to have a go binary holding the 'main' and a go pkg which is the wrapper for xen.

I was thinking about 2 solutions:

  1. I could build 3 different versions of the compiled pkg and also 3 different versions of the main binary each linked with the corresponding pkg version. This solution requires building manually the makefiles so that I can pass the correct paths etc

  2. I could build a thin C wrapper as a shared library and build it in 3 versions against the 3 versions of xen C bindings. This C wrapper would then export a stable C interface which is then used by one single go pkg. Then I can deploy the correct C wrapper shared library to the hosts and have it resolve at runtime

Is there any other way to handle that ? I would prefer using pure (c)go code but I don't like the additional burden of maintaining complicated makefiles.

EDIT: More details about why I feel uncomfortable about handling that manually in the makefiles:

For example the name of the _obj dir is hardcoded in Make.inc and company, and these makefiles rely on some generated .c files containing special information about the name of the shared library, which I have to cleanup before building the next version of the pkg. A snipped of my makefile:

all:
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=3.0
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=3.4
    rm -f _obj/_*
    $(MAKE) -f Makefile.common XENVERSION=4.0

where Makefile.common basically is a normal pkg makefile which uses TARG=$(XENVERSION)/vimini/xen, as I cannot encode the version in the package name because I'd have to modify the imports in the source.

By encoding the version in the package directory I can use GCIMPORTS=-I../../pkg/xen/_obj/$(XENVERSION) to select the right une from the main cmd's Makefile.

Of course I could roll out my own makefile which invokes 6c and 6l, cgo etc, but I prefer to leverage the existing make infrastructure since it seems that there is some wisdom in it.

答案1

得分: 1

你尝试过这种方法吗?

架构和操作系统特定的代码

它可以很容易地适应使用$XENVER环境变量。

英文:

Have you tried this approach?

Architecture- and operating system-specific code

It could easily be adapted to use a $XENVER environment variable.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2011年5月26日 20:16:55
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/6138316.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定