Matlab使用ODE45进行积分的向量化处理,包括if和for循环。

huangapple go评论60阅读模式
英文:

Matlab vectorization with if and for loops using ODE45 to integrate

问题

I am interested in optimizing the speed of my code and when using "Run and Time" this is the function in my code that greatly impacts speed, but I have a hard time conceptualizing how to vectorize this function properly as I usually just do looping, in the attempt I've made I run into an error as it is also used in an integration, my original function is as follows and does not result in an error

function [dotStates] = ODEFunc(t,states,params)
%ODE function
% Loading in and assigning the variables from parameters
K = params(1);                                                             
N = params(2);
nn = params(3);
% magnitude of the coupling based on the number of neighbours
kn = K/nn;
w = params(4:end);
dotStates=states;
    % For each oscillator
    for i=1:N
        % Use the oscillators natural frequency
        dotStates(i) = w(i);
        % For j number of neighbours
        for j=(i-nn):(i+nn)
            % neighbour number is positive and shorter than # of oscilators
            if (j > 0) && (j < length(dotStates))
                dotStates(i) =  dotStates(i) + (kn * sin( states(j)-states(i) ));
            end
        end
    end
end

I've tried following the mathworks vectorization guide: MathWorks Vectorization Guide

My attempt so far has been to follow some of the inputs of what they use, such as using a mask and have generated the following code

function [dotStates] = ODEFunc(t,states,params)
%ODE function
% Loading in and assigning the variables from parameters
K = params(1);                                                             
N = params(2);
nn = params(3);
% magnitude of the coupling based on the number of neighbours
kn = K/nn;
w = params(4:end);
dotStates=states;
% Use the oscillators natural frequency
dotStates = w';
% Mask of j states
j = (i-nn):(i+nn);
% neighbours cannot exceed boundaries
j = j(j>0 & j <= length(dotStates));
jstate = states(j);
jstate(numel(states)) = 0;
dotStates =  dotStates + (kn * sin( jstate'-states ));
end

I ended up with a vector that is shorter than what is being written to, and my solution has been to just add a bunch of zeros to the "jstate" variable to make up for the difference, but that does not feel like proper vectorization. When I run the code, I get the following error which is tied to an integration step:

Warning: Colon operands must be real scalars.
In RK_ODE_2411>ODEFunc (line 99)
In RK_ODE_2411>@(t,states)ODEFunc(t,states,params)
In ode45 (line 324)
In RK_ODE_2411 (line 58)

The function is in turn used in the following segment for the integration using ODE45

%% Integration via ODE45
for K = 0:.1:Klen
    params(1) = K;
    K_count = K_count+1;
    nn_count = 0;
    for nn = nnlen:nnlen
        params(3) = nn;
        % index counter
        nn_count = nn_count+1;
        % 6th order runge kutta

        sol(K_count,nn_count) = ode45(@(t,states) ODEFunc(t,states,params),tSpan,init,options);
    end
end

Where line 58 is

sol(K_count,nn_count) = ode45(@(t,states) ODEFunc(t,states,params),tSpan,init,options);

EDIT: Line 99 in ODEFunc is

j = (i-nn):(i+nn);
英文:

I am interested in optimizing the speed of my code and when using "Run and Time" this is the function in my code that greatly impacts speed, but I have a hard time conceptualizing how to vectorize this function properly as I usually just do looping, in the attempt I've made I run into an error as it is also used in an integration, my original function is as follows and does not result in an error

function [dotStates] = ODEFunc(t,states,params)
%ODE function
% Loading in and assigning the variables from parameters
K = params(1);                                                             
N = params(2);
nn = params(3);
% magnitude of the coupling based on the number of neighbours
kn = K/nn;
w = params(4:end);
dotStates=states;
    % For each oscillator
    for i=1:N
        % Use the oscillators natural frequency
        dotStates(i) = w(i);
        % For j number of neighbours
        for j=(i-nn):(i+nn)
            % neighbour number is positive and shorter than # of oscilators
            if (j &gt; 0) &amp;&amp; (j &lt; length(dotStates))
                dotStates(i) =  dotStates(i) + (kn * sin( states(j)-states(i) ));
            end
        end
    end
end

I've tried following the mathworks vectorization guide: https://se.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/vectorization.html

My attempt so far has been to follow some of the inputs of what they use, such as using a mask and have generated following code

function [dotStates] = ODEFunc(t,states,params)
%ODE function
% Loading in and assigning the variables from parameters
K = params(1);                                                             
N = params(2);
nn = params(3);
% magnitude of the coupling based on the number of neighbours
kn = K/nn;
w = params(4:end);
dotStates=states;
% Use the oscillators natural frequency
dotStates = w&#39;;
% Mask of j states
j = (i-nn):(i+nn);
% neighbours cannot exceed boundaries
j = j(j&gt;0 &amp; j &lt;=length(dotStates));
jstate = states(j);
jstate(numel(states)) = 0;
dotStates =  dotStates + (kn * sin( jstate&#39;-states ));
end

I ended up with a vector that is shorter than what is being written to and my solution has been to just add a bunch of zeros to the "jstate" variable to make up for the difference but that does not feel like a proper vectorization and when I run the code I get the following error which is tied to and integration step

>Warning: Colon operands must be real scalars.

> In RK_ODE_2411>ODEFunc (line 99)
In RK_ODE_2411>@(t,states)ODEFunc(t,states,params)
In ode45 (line 324)
In RK_ODE_2411 (line 58)

the function is in turn used in the following segment for the integration using ODE45

%% Integration via ODE45
for K = 0:.1:Klen
    params(1) = K;
    K_count = K_count+1;
    nn_count = 0;
    for nn = nnlen:nnlen
        params(3) = nn;
        % index counter
        nn_count = nn_count+1;
        % 6th order runge kutta
        
        sol(K_count,nn_count) = ode45(@(t,states) ODEFunc(t,states,params),tSpan,init,options);
    end
end

where line 58 is

sol(K_count,nn_count) = ode45(@(t,states) ODEFunc(t,states,params),tSpan,init,options);

EDIT: line 99 in ODEFunc is

j = (i-nn):(i+nn);

答案1

得分: 1

尝试这段代码片段

% 对于每个振荡器
for i = 1:N
    % 对于邻居数为j
    j = (i - nn):(i + nn);

    % 邻居数是正数且比振荡器的数量短
    lg = (j > 0) & (j < length(dotStates));
    dotStates(i) = w(i) + sum(kn * sin(states(lg) - states(i)));
end

最重要的是,确保 dotStates 不会大于 stats,因为这会迫使Matlab重新排列内存,这会严重减慢代码的运行速度。

英文:

Try this snippet

% For each oscillator
for i=1:N
    % For j number of neighbours
    j=(i-nn):(i+nn);
    
    % neighbour number is positive and shorter than # of oscilators
    lg = (j &gt; 0) &amp; (j &lt; length(dotStates));
    dotStates(i) =  w(i) + sum(kn * sin( states(lg)-states(i) ));
end

the most important is though that dotStates won't be larger than stats, since this would force matlab to rearrange its memory, which slows down the code enormously.

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2020年1月6日 18:49:04
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/59610737.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定