英文:
Go test string contains substring
问题
在Go语言中,你可以使用strings包中的Contains函数来检查一个字符串是否是另一个字符串的子串。例如,你可以使用以下代码来检查someString是否包含"something":
package main
import (
	"fmt"
	"strings"
)
func main() {
	someString := "This is something"
	substring := "something"
	if strings.Contains(someString, substring) {
		fmt.Println("someString包含substring")
	} else {
		fmt.Println("someString不包含substring")
	}
}
运行以上代码,如果someString包含"something",则会输出"someString包含substring";否则,会输出"someString不包含substring"。
英文:
How do I check if a string is a substring of another string in Go?
For example, I want to check someString.contains("something").
答案1
得分: 372
使用 strings 包中的 Contains 函数。
import (
    "strings"
)
strings.Contains("something", "some") // true
英文:
Use the function Contains from the strings package.
import (
    "strings"
)
strings.Contains("something", "some") // true
答案2
得分: 64
要进行比较,有更多的选项:
import (
	"fmt"
	"regexp"
	"strings"
)
const (
	str    = "something"
	substr = "some"
)
// 1. Contains
res := strings.Contains(str, substr)
fmt.Println(res) // true
// 2. Index: 检查 substr 在 str 中第一次出现的索引,如果 substr 不存在则返回 -1
i := strings.Index(str, substr)
fmt.Println(i) // 0
// 3. Split: 通过 substr 进行分割,并检查切片的长度,如果 substr 不存在则长度为 1
ss := strings.Split(str, substr)
fmt.Println(len(ss)) // 2
// 4. Count: 检查 str 中非重叠的 substr 实例的数量
c := strings.Count(str, substr)
fmt.Println(c) // 1
// 5. RegExp
matched, _ := regexp.MatchString(substr, str)
fmt.Println(matched) // true
// 6. Compiled RegExp
re := regexp.MustCompile(substr)
res = re.MatchString(str)
fmt.Println(res) // true
基准测试:
Contains 内部调用了 Index,因此速度几乎相同(顺便说一下,Go 1.11.5 显示的差异比 Go 1.14.3 大一些)。
BenchmarkStringsContains-4              100000000               10.5 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsIndex-4                 117090943               10.1 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsSplit-4                  6958126               152 ns/op              32 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsCount-4                 42397729                29.1 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsRegExp-4                  461696              2467 ns/op            1326 B/op         16 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsRegExpCompiled-4         7109509               168 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
英文:
To compare, there are more options:
import (
	"fmt"
	"regexp"
	"strings"
)
const (
    str    = "something"
	substr = "some"
)
// 1. Contains
res := strings.Contains(str, substr)
fmt.Println(res) // true
// 2. Index: check the index of the first instance of substr in str, or -1 if substr is not present
i := strings.Index(str, substr)
fmt.Println(i) // 0
// 3. Split by substr and check len of the slice, or length is 1 if substr is not present
ss := strings.Split(str, substr)
fmt.Println(len(ss)) // 2
// 4. Check number of non-overlapping instances of substr in str
c := strings.Count(str, substr)
fmt.Println(c) // 1
// 5. RegExp
matched, _ := regexp.MatchString(substr, str)
fmt.Println(matched) // true
// 6. Compiled RegExp
re = regexp.MustCompile(substr)
res = re.MatchString(str)
fmt.Println(res) // true
Benchmarks:
Contains internally calls Index, so the speed is almost the same (btw Go 1.11.5 showed a bit bigger difference than on Go 1.14.3).
BenchmarkStringsContains-4              100000000               10.5 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsIndex-4                 117090943               10.1 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsSplit-4                  6958126               152 ns/op              32 B/op          1 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsCount-4                 42397729                29.1 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsRegExp-4                  461696              2467 ns/op            1326 B/op         16 allocs/op
BenchmarkStringsRegExpCompiled-4         7109509               168 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库,让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。


评论