if作为表达式和if作为语句的区别是什么?

huangapple go评论82阅读模式
英文:

Difference between if as an expression and if as a statement

问题

我正在为您进行翻译,以下是翻译的内容:

所以我在观看关于Go语言的视频 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9VUCp98ay4 ,大约在6:50的时候,一个人问了一个关于为什么他们将if语句实现为语句而不是表达式的问题。这两种实现有什么区别?据我所知,我从来没有因为语言的不同而改变过使用条件语句的方式。

编辑:他在问题中提到的“你需要值而不是变量”是什么意思?

英文:

So I was watching this video on the Go language - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9VUCp98ay4 , and at around 6:50 a guy asks a question about why they implemented if's as statements and not expressions. What is the difference between those two implementations? As far as I know, I've never had to change the way I use a conditional based on the language.

Edit: and what does he mean that "you need values rather than variables" in his question?

答案1

得分: 19

表达式和语句的区别在于,表达式会产生一个值,因此可以在需要值的地方使用。因此,表达式可以作为变量的值、函数的参数或运算符的操作数使用。而语句则不能。

他在问题中提到的“你需要值而不是变量”是什么意思?

我猜他指的是常量(在Scala中称为val)。

如果if是一个表达式,你可以这样做:

const myValue = if condition { value1 } else { value2 }

由于if不是一个表达式,你必须这样做:

var myValue
if condition {
    myValue = value1
} else {
    myValue = value2
}

所以你需要将变量声明为可变的(使用var而不是const),这可能是提问者的意思。

英文:

The difference between expressions and statements is that expressions produce a value and thus can be used in places where values are required. So expressions can be used as values for variables, arguments to functions or operands to operators. Statements can't.

> and what does he mean that "you need values rather than variables" in his question?

I assume that by vals he means constants (which are called vals in Scala for example).

If if were an expression, you could do this:

const myValue = if condition { value1 } else { value2 }

Since if is not an expression, you have to do this:

var myValue
if condition {
    myValue = value1
} else {
    myValue = value2
}

So you needed to make your variable mutable (use var instead of const), which is what the person asking the question likely meant.

答案2

得分: 0

你可以通过在GO语言中使用立即调用的函数(IIF)结合if语句来实现与if表达式相同的代码优雅性。我不是GO程序员(主要使用TypeScript),所以如果出于任何原因这对性能不好,请告诉我。

func main() {
	amIHungry := true
	didMyPaycheckComeInYet := false

	choice := func() string {
		if(!amIHungry && !didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "stay-home"
		}
		if(!amIHungry && didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "buy-new-keyboard"
		}
		if(amIHungry && !didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "make-ramen"
		}
		return "taco-bell-time"
	}()

	println(choice)

}

然后在程序的后面,而不是有一堆上下文不明的状态,你可以有一个简化的"choice"来选择你的应用逻辑。

if(choice == "taco-bell-time"){
   println("Order a bean burrito, but with black beans,")
}

比起

if(amIHungry && didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
     println("Order a bean burrito, but with black beans,")
}

更容易理解。

英文:

You can get the same code elegance that you would get from if expression by using an instantly invoked function (IIF) combined with if statements in GO. I'm not a GO programmer (mainly typescript) so please let me know if this is bad for performance for any reason.

func main() {
	amIHungry := true
	didMyPaycheckComeInYet := false

	choice := func() string {
		if(!amIHungry && !didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "stay-home"
		}
		if(!amIHungry && didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "buy-new-keyboard"
		}
		if(amIHungry && !didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
			return "make-ramen"
		}
		return "taco-bell-time"
	}()

	println(choice)

}

and then later on in your program, rather than having a bunch of out of context states, you can have a simplified "choice" to choose your app logic.

if(choice == "taco-bell-time"){
   println("Order a bean burrito, but with black beans,")
}

is a little easier to reason about than

if(amIHungry && didMyPaycheckComeInYet){
     println("Order a bean burrito, but with black beans,")
}

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2017年6月27日 09:17:39
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/44770962.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定