英文:
Convert []string to []interface{}
问题
我只需要翻译代码部分,以下是翻译好的内容:
我只是想写一些像这样的代码:
func (w Writer) WriteVString(strs []string) (int, error) {
    return writeV(func(index int, str interface{}) (int, error) {
        return w.WriteString(str.(string))
    }, strs) // 它不能工作
}
func (w Writer) WriteV(bs [][]byte) (int, error) {
    return writeV(func(index int, b interface{}) (int, error) {
        return w.Write(b.([]byte))
    }, []interface{}{bs...}) // 它也无法编译
}
type writeFunc func(int, interface{}) (int, error)
func writeV(fn writeFunc, slice []interface{}) (n int, err error) {
    var m int
    for index, s := range slice {
        if m, err = fn(index, s); err != nil {
            break
        }
        n += m
    }
    return
}
我以为interface{}可以表示任何类型,所以[]interface{}也可以表示任何[]type,现在我知道我错了,[]type是一个整体类型,不能被视为[]interface{}。
那么,有人可以帮我让这段代码工作起来吗,或者有其他解决方案吗?
PS:我知道[]byte或string可以相互转换,但这实际上不是我的意图,也许还有其他类型而不是[]byte和string。
英文:
I just want to write some code like this:
func (w Writer) WriteVString(strs []string) (int, error) {
    return writeV(func(index int, str interface{}) (int, error) {
    	return w.WriteString(str.(string))
    }, strs) // it doesn't work
}
func (w Writer) WriteV(bs [][]byte) (int, error) {
    return writeV(func(index int, b interface{}) (int, error) {
    	return w.Write(b.([]byte))
    }, []interface{}{bs...}) // it also can't be compiled
}
type writeFunc func(int, interface{}) (int, error)
func writeV(fn writeFunc, slice []interface{}) (n int, err error) {
    var m int
    for index, s := range slice {
    	if m, err = fn(index, s); err != nil {
    		break
    	}
    	n += m
    )
	return
}
I thought interface{} can represent any type, so []interface can also represent any []type before, now I know I'm wrong, []type is a whole type, can't be considered as []interface{}.
So, can anyone help me how to make this code work, or any other solution?
PS: I know that []byte or string can be converted to one another, but it's not actually my intention, may be there is another type rather than []byte and string.
答案1
得分: 58
是的,这是因为interface{}是它自己的类型(而不是任何其他类型的“别名”)。
正如我在“golang中interface{}的含义是什么?”中提到的(如果v是一个interface{}变量):
> 初学者常常误以为“v是任意类型”,但这是错误的。
v不是任意类型;它是interface{}类型。
FAQ中提到:
> 它们在内存中的表示不同。
>
> 需要逐个复制元素到目标切片。以下示例将一个int切片转换为interface{}切片:
t := []int{1, 2, 3, 4}
s := make([]interface{}, len(t))
for i, v := range t {
    s[i] = v
}
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
    x := []string{"a", "b", "c", "d"}
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", x, x)
    //converting a []string to a []interface{}
    y := make([]interface{}, len(x))
    for i, v := range x {
        y[i] = v
    }
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", y, y)
    //converting a []interface{} to a []string
    z := make([]string, len(y))
    for i, v := range y {
        z[i] = fmt.Sprint(v)
    }
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", z, z)
}
英文:
>  now I know I'm wrong, []type is a whole type, can't be considered as []interface{}.
Yes, and that is because interface{} is its own type (and not an "alias" for any other type).
As I mention in "what is the meaning of interface{} in golang?" (if v is a interface{} variable):
> Beginner gophers are led to believe that “v is of any type”, but that is wrong.
v is not of any type; it is of interface{} type.
The FAQ mentions
> they do not have the same representation in memory.
>
> It is necessary to copy the elements individually to the destination slice.
This example converts a slice of int to a slice of interface{}:
t := []int{1, 2, 3, 4}
s := make([]interface{}, len(t))
for i, v := range t {
    s[i] = v
}
Tom L propose this example (in the comments):
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
    x := []string{"a", "b", "c", "d"}
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", x, x)
    //converting a []string to a []interface{}
    y := make([]interface{}, len(x))
    for i, v := range x {
        y[i] = v
    }
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", y, y)
    //converting a []interface{} to a []string
    z := make([]string, len(y))
    for i, v := range y {
        z[i] = fmt.Sprint(v)
    }
    fmt.Printf("%T: %v\n", z, z)
}
答案2
得分: 11
- 创建一个实用函数,如下所示:
 
func ToGenericArray(arr ...interface{}) []interface{} {
	return arr
}
- 并使用它:
 
func yourfunc(arr []interface{})  {
....
}
yourfunc(ToGenericArray([]string{"a", "b", "c"}))
- 重要提示:以下代码将无法正常工作
 
func yourfunc(arr []interface{})  {
....
}
arr := []string{"a", "b", "c"}
yourfunc(ToGenericArray(arr))
英文:
- Create a utility function, like this
 
func ToGenericArray(arr ...interface{}) []interface{} {
	return arr
}
- And use it:
 
func yourfunc(arr []interface{})  {
....
}
yourfunc(ToGenericArray([...]string{"a", "b", "c"}))
- IMPORTANT NOTICE: the following will not work
 
func yourfunc(arr []interface{})  {
....
}
arr:=[...]string{"a", "b", "c"}
yourfunc(ToGenericArray(arr))
答案3
得分: 0
使用泛型,与sql包一起使用
func toAnyList[T any](input []T) []any{
    list := make([]any, len(input))
    for i, v := range input {
        list[i] = v
    }
    return list
}
使用泛型的函数toAnyList可以将输入的切片转换为any类型的切片。在函数内部,首先创建了一个与输入切片长度相同的any类型切片list。然后,使用range循环遍历输入切片,并将每个元素赋值给list中对应的位置。最后,返回转换后的list切片。
英文:
With generics, useful with sql package
func toAnyList[T any](input []T) []any{
	list := make([]any, len(input))
	for i, v := range input {
		list[i] = v
	}
	return list
}
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库,让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。


评论