在Go语言中进行内存分析时,似乎会出现不一致的结果。

huangapple go评论89阅读模式
英文:

Seemingly inconsistent results when profiling memory in Go

问题

最近我在大型数据集上运行一些用Go编写的数值代码时遇到了内存管理问题。在尝试对问题进行分析时,我用三种不同的方式测量了程序的内存使用情况:使用Go的runtime/pprof包、使用Unix的time实用程序,以及通过手动累加分配的数据的大小。这三种方法给出的结果不一致。

下面是我正在分析的代码的简化版本。它分配了几个切片,在每个索引位置放置值,并将它们放入父切片中:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "os"

    "runtime/pprof"
    "unsafe"
    "flag"
)

var mprof = flag.String("mprof", "", "write memory profile to this file")

func main() {
    flag.Parse()

    N := 1<<15
    psSlice := make([][]int64, N)
    _ = psSlice
    size := 0

    for i := 0; i < N; i++ {
        ps := make([]int64, 1<<10)
        for i := range ps { ps[i] = int64(i) }
        psSlice[i] = ps
        size += int(unsafe.Sizeof(ps[0])) * len(ps)
    }

    if *mprof != "" {
        f, err := os.Create(*mprof)
        if err != nil { panic(err) }
        pprof.WriteHeapProfile(f)
        f.Close()
    }

    fmt.Printf("total allocated: %d MB\n", size >> 20)
}

使用命令$ time time -f "%M kB" ./mem_test -mprof=out.mprof运行该代码会得到以下输出:

total allocated: 256 MB
1141216 kB

real    0m0.150s
user    0m0.031s
sys 0m0.113s

这里的第一个数字256 MB只是根据unsafe.Sizeof计算的数组大小,而第二个数字1055 MB是time报告的结果。运行pprof工具的结果是:

(pprof) top1
Total: 108.2 MB
   107.8  99.5%  99.5%    107.8  99.5% main.main

这些结果在切片长度较小或较大时按预期平滑地缩放。

为什么这三个数字没有更接近?

英文:

I have recently been running some numerical codes written in Go on large datasets and have been encountering memory management issues. While attempting to profile the problem, I have measured the memory usage of my program in three different ways: with Go's runtime/pprof package, with the unix time utility, and by manually adding up the size of the data that I allocated. These three methods do not give me consistent results.

Below is a simplified version of the code that I am profiling. It allocates several slices, puts values at every index and places each of them inside of a parent slice:

package main

import (
    &quot;fmt&quot;
    &quot;os&quot;

    &quot;runtime/pprof&quot;
    &quot;unsafe&quot;
    &quot;flag&quot;
)

var mprof = flag.String(&quot;mprof&quot;, &quot;&quot;, &quot;write memory profile to this file&quot;)

func main() {
    flag.Parse()

    N := 1&lt;&lt;15
    psSlice := make([][]int64, N)
    _ = psSlice
    size := 0

    for i := 0; i &lt; N; i++ {
        ps := make([]int64, 1&lt;&lt;10)
        for i := range ps { ps[i] = int64(i) }
        psSlice[i] = ps
        size += int(unsafe.Sizeof(ps[0])) * len(ps)
    }

    if *mprof != &quot;&quot; {
        f, err := os.Create(*mprof)
        if err != nil { panic(err) }
        pprof.WriteHeapProfile(f)
        f.Close()
    }

    fmt.Printf(&quot;total allocated: %d MB\n&quot;, size &gt;&gt; 20)
}

Running this with the command $ time time -f &quot;%M kB&quot; ./mem_test -mprof=out.mprof results in the output:

total allocated: 256 MB
1141216 kB

real    0m0.150s
user    0m0.031s
sys 0m0.113s

Here the first number, 256 MB, is just the size of the arrays computed from unsafe.Sizeof and the second number, 1055 MB, is what time reports. Running the pprof tool results in

(pprof) top1
Total: 108.2 MB
   107.8  99.5%  99.5%    107.8  99.5% main.main

These results scale smoothly in the way you would expect them to for slices of smaller or larger lengths.

Why don't these three number line up more closely?

答案1

得分: 5

首先,你需要提供一个没有错误的示例。让我们从基本的数字开始。例如,

package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"runtime"
	"unsafe"
)

func WriteMatrix(nm [][]int64) {
	for n := range nm {
		for m := range nm[n] {
			nm[n][m]++
		}
	}
}

func NewMatrix(n, m int) [][]int64 {
	a := make([]int64, n*m)
	nm := make([][]int64, n)
	lo, hi := 0, m
	for i := range nm {
		nm[i] = a[lo:hi:hi]
		lo, hi = hi, hi+m
	}
	return nm
}

func MatrixSize(nm [][]int64) int64 {
	size := int64(0)
	for i := range nm {
		size += int64(unsafe.Sizeof(nm[i]))
		for j := range nm[i] {
			size += int64(unsafe.Sizeof(nm[i][j]))
		}
	}
	return size
}

var nm [][]int64

func main() {
	n, m := 1<<15, 1<<10
	var ms1, ms2 runtime.MemStats
	runtime.ReadMemStats(&ms1)
	nm = NewMatrix(n, m)
	WriteMatrix(nm)
	runtime.ReadMemStats(&ms2)
	fmt.Println(runtime.GOARCH, runtime.GOOS)
	fmt.Println("Actual:  ", ms2.TotalAlloc-ms1.TotalAlloc)
	fmt.Println("Estimate:", n*3*8+n*m*8)
	fmt.Println("Total:   ", ms2.TotalAlloc)
	fmt.Println("Size:    ", MatrixSize(nm))

	// check top VIRT and RES for COMMAND peter
	for {
		WriteMatrix(nm)
	}
}

输出:

$ go build peter.go && /usr/bin/time -f "%M KiB" ./peter
amd64 linux
Actual:   269221888
Estimate: 269221888
Total:    269240592
Size:     269221888
^C
Command exited with non-zero status 2
265220 KiB
$
$ top
VIRT 284268 RES 265136 COMMAND peter

这符合你的预期吗?

请参考MatrixSize函数来正确计算内存大小。

在允许我们使用top命令的无限循环中,通过更新矩阵将其固定为常驻内存。

当你运行这个程序时,你得到什么结果?


错误:

你从/usr/bin/time得到的结果是1056992 KiB,这个结果比实际值大了四倍。这是你版本的/usr/bin/time的一个错误,ru_maxrss报告的是以KB为单位而不是页数。我的Ubuntu版本已经修复了这个问题。

参考资料:

Re: GNU time: incorrect results

time-1.7 counts rusage wrong on Linux

GNU Project Archives: time

“time” 1.7-24 source package in Ubuntu. ru_maxrss报告的是以KB为单位而不是页数。 (Closes: #649402)

#649402 - [PATCH] time overestimates max RSS by a factor of 4 - Debian Bug report logs

> Subject: Fix ru_maxrss reporting Author: Richard Kettlewell
> Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649402
>
> --- time-1.7.orig/time.c
> +++ time-1.7/time.c
> @@ -392,7 +398,7 @@
> ptok ((UL) resp->ru.ru_ixrss) / MSEC_TO_TICKS (v));
> break;
> case 'M': /* Maximum resident set size. /
> - fprintf (fp, "%lu", ptok ((UL) resp->ru.ru_maxrss));
> + fprintf (fp, "%lu", (UL) resp->ru.ru_maxrss);
> break;
> case 'O': /
Outputs. */
> fprintf (fp, "%ld", resp->ru.ru_oublock);

英文:

First, you need to provide an error free example. Let's start with the basic numbers. For example,

package main
import (
&quot;fmt&quot;
&quot;runtime&quot;
&quot;unsafe&quot;
)
func WriteMatrix(nm [][]int64) {
for n := range nm {
for m := range nm[n] {
nm[n][m]++
}
}
}
func NewMatrix(n, m int) [][]int64 {
a := make([]int64, n*m)
nm := make([][]int64, n)
lo, hi := 0, m
for i := range nm {
nm[i] = a[lo:hi:hi]
lo, hi = hi, hi+m
}
return nm
}
func MatrixSize(nm [][]int64) int64 {
size := int64(0)
for i := range nm {
size += int64(unsafe.Sizeof(nm[i]))
for j := range nm[i] {
size += int64(unsafe.Sizeof(nm[i][j]))
}
}
return size
}
var nm [][]int64
func main() {
n, m := 1&lt;&lt;15, 1&lt;&lt;10
var ms1, ms2 runtime.MemStats
runtime.ReadMemStats(&amp;ms1)
nm = NewMatrix(n, m)
WriteMatrix(nm)
runtime.ReadMemStats(&amp;ms2)
fmt.Println(runtime.GOARCH, runtime.GOOS)
fmt.Println(&quot;Actual:  &quot;, ms2.TotalAlloc-ms1.TotalAlloc)
fmt.Println(&quot;Estimate:&quot;, n*3*8+n*m*8)
fmt.Println(&quot;Total:   &quot;, ms2.TotalAlloc)
fmt.Println(&quot;Size:    &quot;, MatrixSize(nm))
// check top VIRT and RES for COMMAND peter
for {
WriteMatrix(nm)
}
}

Output:

<pre>
$ go build peter.go && /usr/bin/time -f "%M KiB" ./peter
amd64 linux
Actual: 269221888
Estimate: 269221888
Total: 269240592
Size: 269221888
^C
Command exited with non-zero status 2
265220 KiB
$

$ top
VIRT 284268 RES 265136 COMMAND peter
</pre>

Is this what you expected?

See MatrixSize for the correct way to calculate the memory size.

In the infinite loop that allows us to use the top command, pin the matrix as resident by updating it.

What results do you get when you run this program?


BUG:

Your result from /usr/bin/time is 1056992 KiB which too large by a factor of four. It's a bug in your version of /usr/bin/time, ru_maxrss is reported in KBytes not pages. My version of Ubuntu has been patched.

References:

Re: GNU time: incorrect results

time-1.7 counts rusage wrong on Linux

GNU Project Archives: time

“time” 1.7-24 source package in Ubuntu. ru_maxrss is reported in KBytes not pages. (Closes: #649402)

#649402 - [PATCH] time overestimates max RSS by a factor of 4 - Debian Bug report logs

> Subject: Fix ru_maxrss reporting Author: Richard Kettlewell
> Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649402
>
> --- time-1.7.orig/time.c
> +++ time-1.7/time.c
> @@ -392,7 +398,7 @@
> ptok ((UL) resp->ru.ru_ixrss) / MSEC_TO_TICKS (v));
> break;
> case 'M': /* Maximum resident set size. /
> - fprintf (fp, "%lu", ptok ((UL) resp->ru.ru_maxrss));
> + fprintf (fp, "%lu", (UL) resp->ru.ru_maxrss);
> break;
> case 'O': /
Outputs. */
> fprintf (fp, "%ld", resp->ru.ru_oublock);

huangapple
  • 本文由 发表于 2014年11月8日 03:39:19
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://go.coder-hub.com/26808810.html
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

确定