英文:
golang working effectively with Null* types
问题
如果你正在使用数据库,Null*
类型在大多数情况下都很有用,因为通常不希望传递一个“零”值,而是希望使用 NOT NULL 约束等来提醒你没有传递所有必要的数据。
所以你可以创建以下结构:
type Role struct {
Id sql.NullInt64
Code sql.NullString
}
这很好,但是现在你无法直接访问属性,而必须使用 Role.Id.Value
来获取和设置值,在一个大型应用程序中,每次访问属性时都需要进行额外的步骤,这会变得非常繁琐。
如果你可以直接赋值,例如 Role.Code = "Fsfs"
,并且在需要进行空值检查时可以使用 Role.Code.IsNull
,那将非常方便。这种情况是否可能?
英文:
If one is working with a database, a Null*
type is useful for most scenarios as one typically does not want a "zero" value going through, you want the NOT NULL constraints etc. to kick up and remind you that you haven't passed in all the data necessary.
So you create a structure like the following:
type Role struct {
Id sql.NullInt64
Code sql.NullString
}
Thats great, but now you cannot get direct access to the properties and have to use Role.Id.Value
to both get and set, this is going to get pretty old in a large app when you have to have the extra step every single time you want access to the properties.
It would be nice if you could assign directly eg. Role.Code = "Fsfs"
, and be able to do something like Role.Code.IsNull
when you are interested in null checking. Is such a thing possible?
答案1
得分: 2
使用中间指针值是一个选项吗?
package main
import "fmt"
type tmp struct {
Value int
}
func getInt() *int {
i := 123
return &i
}
func main() {
// Re
var v *int
v = nil
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", v, v)
if v == nil {
println("nil...")
}
v = getInt()
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", v, *v)
if v != nil {
println("not nil...")
}
s := tmp{*v}
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", s, s)
}
http://play.golang.org/p/lBrwTKh6-v
英文:
Is using intermediate pointer value(s) an option?
package main
import "fmt"
type tmp struct {
Value int
}
func getInt() *int {
i := 123
return &i
}
func main() {
// Re
var v *int
v = nil
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", v, v)
if v == nil {
println("nil...")
}
v = getInt()
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", v, *v)
if v != nil {
println("not nil...")
}
s := tmp{*v}
fmt.Printf("%T / %v\n", s, s)
}
答案2
得分: 1
你可以这样访问 Role.Code:
var r *Role
r.Code = *code
你可以这样检查是否为 null:
fmt.Println(r.Code, r.Code.Valid)
如果你在不使用 sql.Scanner 的情况下手动更改 r.Code 的值,可以使用 Setter 方法:
func (r *Role) SetCode(code string) {
r.Code.String = code
r.Code.Valid = true
}
func main() {
var r *Role
r.SetCode("mi")
if r.Code.Valid {
fmt.Println(r.Code)
}
}
你可以在这里尝试一下:https://play.golang.org/p/faxQUm-2lr
英文:
You can access Role.Code like that:
var r *Role
r.Code = *code
You can check for null like this:
fmt.Println(r.Code, r.Code.Valid)
If you change the value of r.Code manually without using an sql.Scanner a Setter could be helpful:
func (r *Role) SetCode(code string) {
r.Code.String = code
r.Code.Valid = true
}
func main() {
var r *Role
r.SetCode("mi")
if r.Code.Valid {
fmt.Println(r.Code)
}
I tried this out here: https://play.golang.org/p/faxQUm-2lr
答案3
得分: 0
保持应用程序和数据库代码分离。
// 角色属于应用程序代码,不做妥协。
type Role struct {
Id int64
Code string
}
对数据库建模。
// 数据库有表和列。
type Table struct {
Name string
Columns []string
}
var RoleTable = Table{
Name: "roles",
Columns: []string{
"id",
"code",
},
}
编写一次代码以在模型和数据库行之间进行转换。
// 数据库包需要使其工作。
// 将模型写入数据库行。
type Writer struct {
Role
}
func (w *Writer) Write() []interface{} {
return []interface{}{
w.Role.Id,
sql.NullString{
Valid: len(w.Role.Code) > 0,
String: w.Role.String,
},
}
}
// 将数据库行读入模型。
type Reader struct {
Id int64
Code sql.NullString
}
func (r *Reader) Scan(row *sql.Row) error {
return row.Scan(
&r.Id,
&r.Code,
)
}
func (r *Reader) Read() Role {
return Role{
Id: r.Id,
Code: r.Code.String,
}
}
您的模式与应用程序模型解耦。您可以在保存或加载时展开用户联系方式等结构。
// 应用程序代码中的嵌套结构。
type User struct {
TwitterProfile struct {
Id string
ScreenName string
}
}
// 数据库行是规范化的扁平结构。
var UserTable = Table{
Name: "users",
Columns: []string{
"twitter_id",
"twitter_screen_name",
},
}
它很灵活。您甚至可以在没有中间结构的情况下扫描连接行。
type RowMux struct {
vs []interface{}
}
func (mux *RowMux) Scan(vs ...interface{}) error {
mux.vs = append(mux.vs, vs...)
return nil
}
func (mux *RowMux) Mux(row *sql.Row) error {
return row.Scan(mux.vs...)
}
// 扫描连接行!
row := db.QueryRow(SELECT users.*, roles.* FROM users JOIN roles ON users.id = roles.user_id WHERE users.twitter_id = "123"
)
mux := &RowMux{}
userReader := &UserReader{}
userReader.Scan(mux)
roleReader := &RoleReader{}
roleReader.Scan(mux)
if err := mux.Mux(row); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
user := userReader.Read()
role := roleReader.Read()
英文:
Keep app and database code separate.
// Role belongs to app code, no compromises.
type Role struct {
Id int64
Code string
}
Model the database.
// Database has tables with columns.
type Table struct {
Name string
Columns []string
}
var RoleTable = Table{
Name: "roles",
Columns: []string{
"id",
"code",
},
}
Write code once to convert between model and database row.
// Database package needs to make it work.
// Write a model to database row.
type Writer struct {
Role
}
func (w *Writer) Write() []interface{} {
return []interface{}{
w.Role.Id,
sql.NullString{
Valid: len(w.Role.Code) > 0,
String: w.Role.String,
},
}
}
// Read a database row into model.
type Reader struct {
Id int64
Code sql.NullString
}
func (r *Reader) Scan(row *sql.Row) error {
return row.Scan(
&r.Id,
&r.Code,
)
}
func (r *Reader) Read() Role {
return Role{
Id: r.Id,
Code: r.Code.String,
}
}
Your schema is decoupled from app model. You can flatten structures like user contact details when saving or loading.
// Nested struct in app code.
type User struct {
TwitterProfile struct {
Id string
ScreenName string
}
}
// Database row is normalized flat.
var UserTable = Table{
Name: "users",
Columns: []string{
"twitter_id",
"twitter_screen_name",
},
}
It's flexible. You can even scan join rows without intermediate structs.
type RowMux struct {
vs []interface{}
}
func (mux *RowMux) Scan(vs ...interface{}) error {
mux.vs = append(mux.vs, vs...)
return nil
}
func (mux *RowMux) Mux(row *sql.Row) error {
return row.Scan(mux.vs...)
}
// Scan join rows!
row := db.QueryRow(`
SELECT users.*, roles.*
FROM users
JOIN roles ON users.id = roles.user_id
WHERE users.twitter_id = "123"
`)
mux := &RowMux{}
userReader := &UserReader{}
userReader.Scan(mux)
roleReader := &RoleReader{}
roleReader.Scan(mux)
if err := mux.Mux(row); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
user := userReader.Read()
role := roleReader.Read()
通过集体智慧和协作来改善编程学习和解决问题的方式。致力于成为全球开发者共同参与的知识库,让每个人都能够通过互相帮助和分享经验来进步。
评论