Does a break statement break from a switch/select?

I know that switch/select statements break automatically after every case. I am wondering, in the following code:

for {
    switch sometest() {
    case 0:
        dosomething()
    case 1:
        break
    default:
        dosomethingelse()
    }
}

Does the break statement exit the for loop or just the switch block?

> Break statements, The Go Programming Language Specification.
>
> A "break" statement terminates execution of the innermost "for",
> "switch" or "select" statement.
>
> BreakStmt = "break" [ Label ] .
>
> If there is a label, it must be that of an enclosing "for", "switch"
> or "select" statement, and that is the one whose execution terminates
> (§For statements, §Switch statements, §Select statements).
>
> L:
> for i < n {
> switch i {
> case 5:
> break L
> }
> }

Therefore, the break statement in your example terminates the switch statement, the "innermost" statement.
1: http://golang.org/ref/spec#Break_statements

A hopefully illustrative example:

loop:
for {
        switch expr {
        case foo:
                if condA {
                        doA()
                        break // like 'goto A'
                }

                if condB {
                        doB()
                        break loop // like 'goto B'                        
                }

                doC()
        case bar:
                // ...
        }
A:
        doX()
        // ...
}

B:
doY()
// ....

Yes, break breaks the inner switch.

https://play.golang.org/p/SZdDuVjic4

<!-- language: go -->

package main

import "fmt"

func main() {

myloop:
	for x := 0; x < 7; x++ {
		fmt.Printf("%d", x)
		switch {
		case x == 1:
			fmt.Println("start")
		case x == 5:
			fmt.Println("stop")
			break myloop
		case x > 2:
			fmt.Println("crunching..")
			break
		default:
			fmt.Println("idling..")
		}
	}
}

> 0idling..
> 1start
> 2idling..
> 3crunching..
> 4crunching..
> 5stop
>
> Program exited.

This question might be too old already but I still think label makes our code become harder to read.
Instead of breaking the for inside select, just set a flag for the loop and handle it inside select-case before invoking break.
For example:

loop := true
for loop {
    select {
    case <-msg:
        // do your task here
    case <-ctx.Done():
        loop = false
        break
    }
}

Updated: Totally agree with Vaelin in the comment. Declaring that flag inside the scope of the for loop can avoid memory leak and conflict with other variables in current scope, just in case we have a same variable name already.

for loop := true; loop; {

}

Just from a switch block. There's plenty of examples in Golang own code you can examine (compare inner break with outer break).

this should explain it.

for{
    x := 1
	switch {
    case x >0:
        fmt.Println("sjus")
    case x == 1:
        fmt.Println("GFVjk")
    default:
        fmt.Println("daslkjh")
    }
}
}

Runs forever

for{
    x := 1
	switch {
    case x >0:
        fmt.Println("sjus")
        break
    case x == 1:
        fmt.Println("GFVjk")
    default:
        fmt.Println("daslkjh")
    }
}
}

Again, runs forever

BUT

package main

import "fmt"

func main() {
d:
for{
x := 1
	switch {
    case x >0:
        fmt.Println("sjus")
        break d
    case x == 1:
        fmt.Println("GFVjk")
    default:
        fmt.Println("daslkjh")
    }
}
}

will print sjus
... clear ?

http://play.golang.org/p/GOvnfI67ih

It only exits the switch block.